Proof that Compact Subset of Metric Space is Bounded

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rasalhague
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bounded Compact
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that a compact subset of a metric space is indeed bounded, as established in lecture 8 of Francis Su's Real Analysis online series. The proof utilizes the concept of open covers and finite subcovers, demonstrating that for a compact set A within a metric space (X,d), every open cover can be reduced to a finite subcover. The proof specifically employs open balls of radius r centered on points in A, leading to the conclusion that an open ball B(x,s+2r) encompasses the entire set A, where s is the maximum distance between centers of the finite subcover.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concepts of compactness and open covers
  • Knowledge of distance functions and open balls in metric spaces
  • Basic principles of real analysis, particularly those covered in Francis Su's lectures
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of compactness in more detail, focusing on its implications in metric spaces
  • Learn about the Heine-Borel theorem and its relationship to compact sets
  • Explore the properties of open covers and finite subcovers in various types of topological spaces
  • Review examples of bounded and unbounded sets within metric spaces to solidify understanding
USEFUL FOR

Students of real analysis, mathematicians interested in topology, and educators teaching concepts related to metric spaces and compactness.

Rasalhague
Messages
1,383
Reaction score
2
Compact --> bounded

In lecture 8 of Francis Su's Real Analysis online lecture series, he has a proof that a compact subset of a metric space is bounded: Given a metric space (X,d), if A is a compact subset of X, then every open cover of A has a finite subcover. Let B be a set of open balls of radius r, one centered on each point of A. This is an open cover of A, so it has a finite subcover {Bi}. Let C be the set of distances between pairs of center points of the elements of the subcover {Bi}. Let s = max C. Then B(x,s+2r) is an open ball that includes A.

My question: why the 2? Isn't B(x,s+r) also an open ball that includes A? If u is a point in A, then

d(x,u) <= d(x,w) + d(w,u) <= s + r

where w is the center of an open ball in {Bi} that contains u.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


set up a horizonal row of spheres tangent to each other. then s=r*2*(k-1), k=number of spheres. the total diameter is s+2r=r*2*k=d. now draw B(x, d) and note: but where's x? is it in the center or somewhere else?
 
Last edited:


Ah, I see now. I made x be the center of one of the open balls in my proof, although I forgot to mention that. He must have been been taking x to be an arbitrary point of A. Thanks, xaos.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
572
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K