Proof that gamma matrices form a complete basis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Dirac gamma matrices, along with the identity matrix and associated tensor, form a complete basis for 4×4 matrices, as established in quantum field theory (QFT). This conclusion is supported by the properties of the matrices, which include the identity matrix (1 component), gamma matrices (4 components), sigma matrices (6 components), and the pseudo-scalar gamma matrices (1 component). The relationship between these matrices and their linear independence confirms their ability to span the entire space of 4×4 matrices. Understanding this basis is crucial for studying the effective weak Hamiltonian in particle phenomenology.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with Dirac gamma matrices and their properties in quantum field theory.
  • Understanding of Clifford algebra and its representation in matrix form.
  • Knowledge of linear independence and basis concepts in vector spaces.
  • Basic grasp of particle phenomenology and the effective weak Hamiltonian.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Dirac gamma matrices in detail, focusing on their role in QFT.
  • Learn about Clifford algebra and its applications in physics, particularly in relation to the gamma matrices.
  • Investigate the mathematical proof of linear independence among the Dirac gamma matrices.
  • Explore textbooks or online resources that cover the effective weak Hamiltonian and its derivation.
USEFUL FOR

Graduate students in physics, quantum field theorists, and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of particle physics and the role of gamma matrices in theoretical frameworks.

joe_blogs
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm interested in proving/demonstrating/understanding why the Dirac gamma matrices, plus the associated tensor and identity, form a complete basis for 4\times4 matrices.

In my basic QFT course, the Dirac matrices were introduced via the Dirac equation, and we proved various properties. After doing this, we were presented with this table:
<br /> \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|} \hline<br /> Form of element &amp;Transforms as &amp;\# of components\\ \hline<br /> $\mathds{I}$ &amp;scalar &amp; 1 \\<br /> $\gamma^\mu$ &amp; vector &amp; 4 \\<br /> $\sigma^{\mu\nu}$ &amp; tensor &amp; 6 \\<br /> $\gamma^5\gamma^\mu$&amp; pseudo-vector &amp; 4 \\<br /> $\gamma^5$ &amp; pseudo-scalar &amp; 1 \\ \hline<br /> \end{tabular}
and told that these elements formed a complete basis for 4\times4 matrices. I've used this fact, and am now employing it in studying the effective weak Hamiltonian as part of an introduction to particle phenomenology. I'm now interested in understanding why it is true.

I've looked through these forums and my searching hasn't turned up a complete answer, or enough of a hint to figure it out. One suggestion I found involved showing the gammas form a Clifford algebra, which can be represented by the matrices over the quaternions. The suggestion was then that the move to matrices over the complex numbers involved the addition of the \gamma^5, but I don't know how to work out the detail here.

I'm happy to be directed to textbooks/online sources.

Thanks.

P.S. I'm a grad student, so while I don't have homework I guess I'll mention in the interests of full disclosure that this isn't any sort of assignment for credit, but rather something I want to grasp to further my understanding of a subject I am new to.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you notice that 1+4+6+4+1 = 16 = 4 x 4 ?
Once you notice that, does it make sense that if those matrices are independent, they must form a complete basis ?
 
Ah, that's very simple. I guess I was stuck on the fact that the matrices have multiple dependencies between them. Because of that I was fixed on showing their span was the whole space. But obviously they're linearly independent so I don't need that...

Ok, thanks. ^_^
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K