Proof that Non-Singularity of I-AB Implies Non-Singularity of I-BA

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eyehategod
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if the matrix I-AB is non-singular, then I-BA is also non-singular. The original poster's proof was partially correct but lacked completeness in demonstrating that the left inverse also serves as a right inverse. Additionally, the proof did not explicitly state that the non-singularity of I-BA is tied to its determinant being non-zero, as defined in their textbook. These omissions likely contributed to the loss of points on the test.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix theory, specifically non-singularity and inverses.
  • Familiarity with matrix operations and properties, including determinants.
  • Knowledge of linear algebra concepts such as left and right inverses.
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and logical reasoning in mathematics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of matrix inverses, focusing on left and right inverses.
  • Learn about determinants and their role in determining matrix singularity.
  • Review linear algebra proofs related to matrix non-singularity.
  • Explore additional examples of matrix transformations and their implications in linear algebra.
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of matrix properties and proofs related to non-singularity.

eyehategod
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Prove that if the matrix I-AB is non-singular, then so i I-BA.
This was one of my test questions and got 3 points off. Can anyone tell me what I did wrong.

my proof:
assume I-AB is nonsingular
then (I-AB)^{-1} exists

Let C=(I-AB)^{-1}
Consider (I+BCA)(I-BA)=I-BA+BCA-BCABA
=I-BA+BC(I-AB)A
=I-BA+B(I-AB)^{-1} (I-AB)A
=I-BA+BIA
=I-BA+BA
=I
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
3 points over how many?

Maybe you lost some points because

i) You did not prove that if C is the left inverse of A, then it is also a right inverse. So you might have lost some points because you only showed that (I+BCA) is the left inverse of (I-BA).

ii) The definition of nonsingular in your book is that A is nonsingular if its determinant is nonzero. And so, you might have lost some points because you did not explain that since I-BA had an inverse, then its determinant was nonzero and hence I-BA is nonsingular.

But other than that, your proof looks very good! go see your instructor.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K