Proof that the solutions are algebraic functions

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the proof that solutions to certain differential equations are algebraic functions, specifically focusing on the equation $y' = P(x)y$, where $P(x) = -\frac{\alpha_1(x)}{\alpha_0(x)}$ and $\alpha_i(x) \in K[x]$. The participants question the validity of statements regarding solutions in the algebraic closure $\overline{K}_{\mathfrak{p}}(x)$ and the implications of polynomial factorization in $\overline{K}[x]$. The proof is confirmed to hold for $n=1$, establishing a foundational understanding of algebraic functions in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, specifically the form $y' = P(x)y$.
  • Familiarity with algebraic closures, particularly $\overline{K}_{\mathfrak{p}}$ and $\overline{K}[x]$.
  • Knowledge of polynomial factorization in fields, especially in relation to $K[x]$ and $K(x)$.
  • Basic concepts of algebraic functions and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of algebraic closures and their implications for polynomial equations.
  • Learn about the existence and uniqueness of solutions for differential equations of the form $y' = P(x)y$.
  • Explore the relationship between algebraic functions and their differential equations.
  • Investigate Grothedieck's problem and its relevance to algebraic functions in higher dimensions.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in algebraic geometry, differential equations, and field theory, will benefit from this discussion.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I am looking at the following:

View attachment 5008

View attachment 5009

View attachment 5010 View attachment 5011

View attachment 5012 I haven't really understood the proof...

Why do we consider the differential equation $y'=P(x)y$ ? (Wondering)

Why does the sentence: "If $(3)_{\mathfrak{p}}$ has a solution in $\overline{K}_{\mathfrak{p}}(x)$, then $(3)_{\mathfrak{p}}$ has also a solution $y_{\mathfrak{p}}$ in $\overline{K}_{\mathfrak{p}}[x]$." stand? (Wondering)
 

Attachments

  • id.PNG
    id.PNG
    37.7 KB · Views: 120
  • gr.PNG
    gr.PNG
    14 KB · Views: 118
  • tche.PNG
    tche.PNG
    10.2 KB · Views: 123
  • tcheg1.PNG
    tcheg1.PNG
    12 KB · Views: 119
  • tcheg2.PNG
    tcheg2.PNG
    27.1 KB · Views: 127
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Why do we consider the differential equation $y'=P(x)y$ ?

Since the proof for Grothedieck's problem stands for $n=1$, we consider a differential equation of the form $\alpha_0(x)y'+\alpha_1(x) y=0, \alpha_i(x)\in K[x]$.
So $\alpha_0(x)y'+\alpha_1 (x) y=0 \Rightarrow \alpha_0(x)y'=-\alpha_1(x)y \Rightarrow y'=P(x)y$, where $P(x)=-\frac{\alpha_1(x)}{\alpha_0(x)}\in K(x)$.

Is this correct? (Wondering)
mathmari said:
Why does the sentence: "If $(3)_{\mathfrak{p}}$ has a solution in $\overline{K}_{\mathfrak{p}}(x)$, then $(3)_{\mathfrak{p}}$ has also a solution $y_{\mathfrak{p}}$ in $\overline{K}_{\mathfrak{p}}[x]$." stand? (Wondering)

$\overline{K}$ is the algebraic closure, right?

We have that any polynomial in a field $K[x]$ factors into linear factors in the algebraic closure $\overline{K}[x]$. Does this hold also for the elements of a field of fraction $K(x)$?

Also how do we conclude that $\beta_i \in \mathbb{Q}$ ? (Wondering)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
993
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K