Proove logarithmic differentiation by induction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a property of logarithmic differentiation related to a polynomial function P(z) defined as the product of linear factors. The original poster is attempting to establish the validity of a formula by induction, specifically for the case where the number of factors increases from k to k+1.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the product rule for differentiation and questions whether their approach constitutes a valid induction proof. They express uncertainty about how to iterate the proof correctly.
  • Some participants suggest differentiating the polynomial using the product rule and provide hints on how to structure the proof by induction.
  • Others clarify the steps needed to transition from the k case to the k+1 case, emphasizing the importance of correctly applying the product rule.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and guidance on how to approach the proof. There is a clear exploration of the inductive step, and the original poster acknowledges the assistance received, indicating progress in their understanding.

Contextual Notes

The problem involves complex functions, and the participants are navigating the nuances of applying mathematical induction in the context of logarithmic differentiation.

Warr
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
[tex]{\frac{P'(z)}{P(z)} = \frac{1}{z-z_1} + \frac{1}{z-z_2} + . . . + \frac{1}{z-z_n}[/tex]

where [tex]P(z)=(z-z_1)(z-z_2)...(z-z_n)[/tex]

Any hints? I've shown it works for a few specific cases..now I have to show that it works for n=k+1. I tried adding a [tex]\frac{1}{z-z_{k+1}}[/tex] term to both sides, and trying the product rule for P'(z)..but couldn't really get anywhere.

btw, these are complex functions, althought I don't think it makes a difference here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Have you tried differentiating P(z) using the product rule?
Something like:
[tex](f(x) g(x) h(x))' = f'(x) g(x) h(x) + f(x) g'(x) h(x) + f(x) g(x) h'(x)[/tex].
Can you go from here? :)
 
yup I did that..

I know I can directly show it..but is this induction?

I mean I can get

[tex]\frac{(z-z_2)...(z-z_n) + (z-z_1)(z-z_3)...(z-z_n) + ... (z-z_1)...(z-z_{n-1})}{(z-z_1)(z-z_2)...(z-z_n)}[/tex]

which obviously gives the R.S of the eq'n in my first post, but is this 'Shown by induction on n'? I thought I had to interate by 1 term and then prove that it holds to the pattern.
 
Okay, so let:
[tex]P_x(z) = \prod_{i = 1} ^ x (z - z_i)[/tex].
You need to prove:
[tex]\frac{P'_n(z)}{P_n(z)} = \sum_{i = 1} ^ n \frac{1}{z - z_i}[/tex] (for n >= 1).
Of course:
[tex]\frac{P'_1(z)}{P_1(z)} = \sum_{i = 1} ^ 1 \frac{1}{z - z_i} = \frac{1}{z - z_1}[/tex] is true.
Now, assume that:
[tex]\frac{P'_k(z)}{P_k(z)} = \sum_{i = 1} ^ k \frac{1}{z - z_i}[/tex]
You need to prove that:
[tex]\frac{P'_{k + 1}(z)}{P_{k + 1}(z)} = \sum_{i = 1} ^ {k + 1} \frac{1}{z - z_i} = \sum_{i = 1} ^ {k} \left( \frac{1}{z - z_i} \right) + \frac{1}{1 + z_{k + 1}}[/tex].
Now, note that: [tex]P_{k + 1}(z) = P_{k} (z) \times (z - z_{k + 1})[/tex]. Can you differentiate [tex]P_{k + 1}(z)[/tex] with repect to z in terms of [tex]P_{k}(z), \quad \mbox{and} \quad (z - z_{k + 1})[/tex]?
From there, can you solve the problem?
 
Last edited:
ah yes, thanks :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K