Hello--I'm looking at Peskin p.324-323 where he describes the renormalization of [tex]\phi^4[/tex] theory. I'm a little confused about the Feynman rules that one gets out of the lagrangian with counter terms.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

My question in a nutshell: The propagator is given by [tex]\frac{i}{p^2 - m^2}[/tex], why is it that the counter term looks like the inverse of this, namely [tex]i(p^2\delta_Z - \delta_m)[/tex], when they come from terms in the lagrangian that have identical form?

That is to say, the lagrangian contains the terms:

[tex]\frac{1}{2}(\partial_\mu \phi_r)^2 - \frac{1}{2}m^2\phi_r^2 + \frac{1}{2}\delta_Z(\partial_\mu \phi_r)^2 -\frac{1}{2}\delta_m\phi_r^2[/tex]

The first two yield the propagator with junk in the denominator, while the last two yield a counterterm with junk in the numerator.

Why is this?

I can "read off" the rules for the counter terms, and it makes sense that it puts stuff in the numerator. Similarly, I know that the propagator is given by the Green's function of the free theory, which is why it yields something in the denominator. But am I thinking about it too much if I think it's really strange?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Propagator counterterm in phi^4

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**