Proper acceleration of cyclotron particle.

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2
Hey! I've been working on a problem here for which I have found the four acceleration of a particle going in a circle with radius R to be

[tex]\underline{A} = -R\omega^2 \gamma^2 (0,\cos(\omega \gamma \tau), \sin(\omega \gamma \tau), 0)[/tex]

and in going from this to find the proper acceleration I reasoned as follows: The four acceleration is valid in all inertial frames and in the instantaneous rest frame of the particle it self it will have a spatial four acceleration which is the proper acceleration of the particle, i.e

[tex]\underline{A} = (0, \vec a_0)[/tex]
in the instantaneous particle. In this frame [itex]\gamma[/itex]=1 so i reasoned that if i just sett [itex]\gamma[/itex]=1 in the above expression I get the proper acceleration. I thus obtain

[tex]\vec a_0 = -\omega ^2 R(\cos(\omega \tau), \sin(\omega \tau),0)[/tex]
which means that
[tex]a_0 = \omega^2 R.[/tex]
but laboratory frame of the cyclotron
[tex]v = \omega R \ \ \ \ a = \frac{v^2}{R}[/tex]
so that
[tex]a_0 = a[/tex]
So this is clearly wrong.
However another line of reasoning would be to say that in the instantaneous rest frame of the particle
[tex]\underline{A} = (0, \vec a_0)[/tex]
so the invariant norm is equal to

[tex]\vec a_0^2 = A_\mu A^\mu = (R\omega^2 \gamma^2)^2[/tex]
such that
[tex]a_0 = R\omega^2 \gamma^2 = \gamma^2 a[/tex]
Which is correct. So my question is, what is wrong about the first line of reasoning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I spotted my error. The four acceleration is not valid in all inertial frames. One must transform it to another reference frame in order to use it there.
 
Last edited:
center o bass said:
I think I spotted by error. The four acceleration is not valid in all inertial frames. One must transform it to another reference frame in order to use it there.

Less than 5 minutes later you spotted your error? Ok.
 
dimension10 said:
Less than 5 minutes later you spotted your error? Ok.

Yes, I'm sorry. It is amazing how your subconsciousness works on the problem when you are trying to formulate it.