Properties, General Results on of Aut(G) ?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter WWGD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General Properties
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of the automorphism group of the cyclic group G = {1, -1, i, -i}. It is established that every homomorphism h: G → G can be expressed in the form z → z^k for some integer k. The participants agree that since G is cyclic, knowing the image of a generator is sufficient to determine the entire homomorphism. This conclusion is supported by the fundamental properties of cyclic groups and their automorphisms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cyclic groups in abstract algebra
  • Familiarity with homomorphisms and their properties
  • Knowledge of automorphism groups
  • Basic concepts of group theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the structure of cyclic groups in more depth
  • Learn about the properties of automorphism groups in group theory
  • Explore examples of homomorphisms in different algebraic structures
  • Investigate the implications of generators in cyclic groups
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in group theory and its applications in various mathematical contexts.

WWGD
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
7,806
Reaction score
13,125
Hi, just curious: I saw a result that for the multiplicative group G:= {1,-1, i, -i } , "every

homomorphism ## h: G \rightarrow G ## is of the form ## z \rightarrow z^k ## for some

##k \in \mathbb Z ##. I can show this is true by considering the image of a generator, but

I was wondering if there are general results about the automorphism groups that may also

apply. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this has to see with the fact that this G is cyclic. Then once we know the value of ## z^k## for some generator, we know the
whole homomorphism. But that is not a proof.
 
WWGD said:
I think this has to see with the fact that this G is cyclic. Then once we know the value of ## z^k## for some generator, we know the
whole homomorphism. But that is not a proof.

I think it is a proof. What do you think is missing? For a cyclic group you are correct that the automorphism is determined by the image of a generator.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
7K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K