Properties of Gl(n,R); R a ring/division ring

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bacle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Properties Ring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the properties of the general linear group Gl(n,R), where R is a ring or division ring. It establishes that a matrix is invertible over R if its determinant is a unit, contrasting this with the case of Gl(n,F), where F is a field, where nonzero determinants guarantee invertibility. The conversation also touches on the relationship between Gl(n,R) and orthogonal and symplectic groups, which are defined based on R-modules and associated quadratic forms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general linear groups, specifically Gl(n,R)
  • Knowledge of ring theory and the properties of rings and fields
  • Familiarity with determinants and their role in matrix invertibility
  • Basic concepts of R-modules and quadratic forms
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Gl(n,F) and how they differ from Gl(n,R)
  • Study the conditions for matrix invertibility in various types of rings
  • Explore the definitions and properties of orthogonal and symplectic groups
  • Investigate the implications of determinants in noncommutative rings
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying linear algebra, particularly those interested in group theory and the properties of matrices over different algebraic structures.

Bacle
Messages
656
Reaction score
1
Hi, All:

Could someone please tell me or give me a ref. on the basic properties of

Gl(n,R) ; R a ring; possibly a division ring, and Gl(n,R) the group (under composition)

of matrices invertible over R ? (I imagine we need a ring R with 1 , to talk about

invertibility). I mostly would like to see how the properties of Gl(n,R) are different

from those of Gl(n,F) , where F is a field.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a commutative ring, a matrix is invertible if and only if its determinant is a unit.
If that ring is a field, every nonzero element is a unit so we recover the well-known result that a matrix is invertible if and only if it has nonvanishing determinant.
Example: a matrix over the integers has an inverse over the integers if and only if its determinant is plus or minus 1.

As for noncommutative rings, I really don't know anything...
 
Wow, I'm keeping you busy today, henry_m.

Do you know anything about orthogonal and symplectic groups

associated to Gl(n,R)? I mean, we have an R-module R_M , and

symplectic /quadratic forms q_S , q_Q respectively . Then the symplectic/orthogonal group

associated with (R_M,Q) is defined to be the subgroup of Gl(n,R) that preserves q_S, resp. q_Q.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K