Property of the dirac delta function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the Dirac delta function, specifically the relationship between δ(x-a) and δ(a-x). Participants explore the mathematical foundations and implications of this property, including definitions and proofs, within the context of distribution theory and integral calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Jonathan questions the equivalence of δ(x-a) and δ(a-x) and seeks clarification on the derivation.
  • Some participants inquire about the definition of the Dirac delta function, suggesting that it may be defined through distributions.
  • A formal definition of the Dirac delta function is presented, involving an integral representation that leads to the conclusion that δ(x-a) = δ(a-x) under certain conditions.
  • One participant proposes a change of variable in the integral to demonstrate the property of the delta function being even.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the Dirac delta function is zero everywhere except at zero and has an infinite value at that point, suggesting that this property supports the equivalence of δ(x-a) and δ(a-x).
  • There is a discussion about the implications of integrating functions against the delta function and how this relates to the equality of δ(x-a) and δ(a-x).
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the steps in the proof and the implications of changing variables in the integral.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the property that δ(x-a) = δ(a-x) under certain conditions, but there is no consensus on the specific steps or definitions involved in proving this property. Some participants express confusion about the mathematical reasoning, indicating that the discussion remains partially unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential missing assumptions regarding the definitions of the Dirac delta function and the conditions under which the equivalence holds. The discussion also reflects varying levels of familiarity with the mathematical concepts involved.

jk89
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello team!

I saw the other day in a textbook that the Dirac delta function of the form d(x-a) can be written as d(a-x) but the method was not explained. I was wondering if anyone know where this comes from. I've been googling but can seem to find it out. Any help would be appreciated.

Cheers!
Jonathan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you define the Dirac delta function?? Did you do it by distributions?
 
The formal definition preceding the statement was:
f(a) = ∫f(x)d(x-a)dx the integral goes from inf to -inf
I was thinking maybe you make a change of variable.
 
Hi. So you would like to prove delta function is even function, I.e. delta x =delta -x.
 
Yes, i guess this is the crux of the problem.
 
Hi.

jk89 said:
The formal definition preceding the statement was:
f(a) = ∫f(x)d(x-a)dx the integral goes from inf to -inf

∫f(x)Δ(a-x)dx, x[-∞,+ ∞]
=∫f(-t)Δ(a+t)dt, t[-∞,+ ∞]
=f(a)

Subtracting each other,
for any f(x) ∫f(x){Δ(x-a)-Δ(a-x)}dx=0
so Δ(x-a)=Δ(a-x).

Regards.
 
I'm also interested in this proof.

if i start out with

f(a)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)\delta(a-x) dx [1]

and make the change of variable x\rightarrow -t

\Rightarrow dx\rightarrow -dt

then

f(a)=-\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(-t)\delta(a+t)dt [2]


i'm a bit confused how you then get one of them in the form δ(x-a)
 
You forgot another part of the definition; The dirac delta function is a function that is 0 everywhere except at zero and:
Δ(0) = infinity

With this in mind:
x-a = a-x when x = a
 
Last edited:
Avatrin said:
You forgot another part of the definition; The dirac delta function is a function that is 0 everywhere except at zero and:
Δ(0) = infinity

With this in mind:
x-a = a-x when x = a

More precisely, the dirac delta function has the property that

\int_b^c dx f(x)\delta(x-a) = \left\{\begin{array}{c} f(a),~a \in [b,c] \\ 0,~\mbox{otherwise} \end{array}\right.

The delta function doesn't really have a well-defined meaning outside of an integral, so as far as we're concerned, if integrating f(x) against \delta(x-a) or \delta(a-x) gives you the same result, then \delta(x-a) = \delta(a-x).
 
  • #10
Hi.
knowlewj01 said:
f(a)=-\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(-t)\delta(a+t)dt [2]
f(a)=-\int_{\infty}^{-\infty}f(-t)\delta(a+t)dt [2]
isn't it? Regards.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
10K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K