Protecting new work for Publication

  • Thread starter Thread starter skynelson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Publication Work
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the process of protecting intellectual work prior to and during publication, specifically in the context of theoretical physics. Participants share their experiences and suggestions regarding how to document and safeguard ideas, as well as the implications of copyright and publication practices.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest uploading papers to arXiv as a means of establishing a public record of the work.
  • Others emphasize the importance of maintaining well-organized, dated notebooks to document the development of ideas and provide evidence of originality.
  • A participant warns that until work is published, ideas are vulnerable to being "scooped" by others.
  • There are differing opinions on the necessity of protecting ideas, with some arguing that if the work is original, it should be submitted to a journal for publication.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the concerns of those who fear their work will be stolen, suggesting that such worries may indicate a lack of professional credibility.
  • Another participant defends their qualifications, stating their academic background and teaching experience in physics.
  • Some participants recommend giving talks and presenting at conferences to establish ownership of ideas and encourage citation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the best practices for protecting intellectual work, with no consensus reached on a single approach. Some emphasize documentation and public availability, while others question the necessity of such measures.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the variability in practices across different fields and the potential for differing interpretations of copyright and publication norms. The discussion reflects a mix of personal experiences and professional insights, with some contributions being more critical than others.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to researchers and academics in theoretical physics, as well as those concerned with intellectual property issues in the context of academic publishing.

skynelson
Messages
57
Reaction score
4
Hi,
I am wondering about the process of protecting one's intellectual work before and during publication. I am in the process of preparing a series of papers that contain a combination of old and new ideas to the field of study they are in. I'm a professional musician also, familiar with the world of copyrights, but I'm aware that I cannot copyright an idea or theory. I simply want to be able to show evidence of the time period during which I developed this work so that if it becomes used in the future I will be credited.

this is set of papers in theoretical physics.
what do people usually do?

thank you for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cristo said:
Upload your papers to the arxiv: www.arxiv.org.
arXiv is the best place, but nowadays new posters have to be endorsed by old posters, so it doesn't work for everyone. You can also publish your work on a personal website. Publishing just means "publicly available". At the least you should keep all your work, including intermediate steps and errors, and date them. This way you can be credited by future historians long after you are dead. If you would like to get credited while you are alive, you can try what this guy did:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_Gould.
 
skynelson said:
Hi,
I am wondering about the process of protecting one's intellectual work before and during publication. I am in the process of preparing a series of papers that contain a combination of old and new ideas to the field of study they are in. I'm a professional musician also, familiar with the world of copyrights, but I'm aware that I cannot copyright an idea or theory. I simply want to be able to show evidence of the time period during which I developed this work so that if it becomes used in the future I will be credited.

this is set of papers in theoretical physics.
what do people usually do?

thank you for your help!

Document, document, document! Dated, well-organized notebooks or journals that track your progress will help provide such evidence should a time-line become important. However, in the world of science, ideas are up for grabs until published. There's nothing more frustrating than being "scooped" by someone who had the same idea and beat you to publication.

The other advice I can give is to learn about the reputations of people in your field. Some people have wonderful reputations for being good collaborators...you can bounce ideas off them and get advice and they won't steal your ideas but rather help with them (if the help is substantial enough, of course, you may need to include them as a coauthor). Others have a bad reputation for stealing ideas and work in a large enough group that they always win the race to the finish line...avoid them!

Your published works WILL be copyrighted, but not by yourself. Unless physics is very different from biology, publishers usually require transfer of copyright at the time of publication.
 
If you believe that your work is truly original and somehow contributes to the advancement of knowledged in a particular field, then find a journal and submit the articles. Most journals will publish articles with the date of submission. Before you submit however, it's really just a free-for-all.
 
skynelson said:
Hi,
I am wondering about the process of protecting one's intellectual work before and during publication. I am in the process of preparing a series of papers that contain a combination of old and new ideas to the field of study they are in. I'm a professional musician also, familiar with the world of copyrights, but I'm aware that I cannot copyright an idea or theory. I simply want to be able to show evidence of the time period during which I developed this work so that if it becomes used in the future I will be credited.

this is set of papers in theoretical physics.
what do people usually do?

thank you for your help!

Please, don't take what I'm about to say to be designed to be personally offensive. However, based on all too personal experience of, ahem, interesting characters who have had the same question as you, if you're worried about people "stealing" your desperately important "research," you're almost certainly a crank. This is almost certainly true (i.e., within six-sigma) if you (a) have never held a professional position at a university or (b) actually have no formal training in physics whatsoever. In particular, such people would seem to be dangerously close to satisfying criteria 12 on the Crackpot index.

Let me put it another way: in (just over) a decade as a professional physicist, the only people whom I have seen express an interest in preventing unscrupulous, unnamed "others" from stealing their work are the sort of people who would make one feel very, very uncomfortable were one to find oneself sat next to them on public transport.

EDIT: Just as a possibly helpful -- if brutally honest -- addendum, let me point out that it's worth asking yourself the following question: is it reasonable to expect that someone who evidently is having a hard time comprehending basic special relativity will currently be capable of producing work of interest to professional physicists, and hence of sufficient quality to be worth publishing?
 
Last edited:
thank you all for your help.
Shoehorn, I think you have the wrong guy. I'm not sure why you assume I'm having trouble understanding basic special relativity. I do think relativity is counterintuitive, and not quite fully understood by anybody. So I do not pretend to know more than I do.

I have a BA in physics from UC Berkeley, and have taught relativity and the entire breath of high school and college level physics many, many times in a professional setting, for about nine years.

anyway, your brutal honesty does not bother me. Thank you for the feedback! I know there are a lot of people who think they know more about physics than they do!
 
skynelson said:
Hi,
I am wondering about the process of protecting one's intellectual work before and during publication.
<snip>
what do people usually do?

thank you for your help!

People usually submit the paper to a Journal and then "hit the road"- give talks on the subject at conferences and Departments to get their idea out there. This is also how people know it's your idea and know to cite your work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
550