Proth Primes: Coefficient & Exponent Relations

Click For Summary
Proth numbers are defined as k·2^n + 1, where k is an odd positive integer and n is a positive integer satisfying 2^n > k. The discussion explores additional relationships between the exponent n and the coefficient k when Proth numbers are prime, particularly under specific modular conditions. It suggests that if n is odd and greater than 1, then gcd(k-1, 3) must equal 1, while if n is even, gcd(k+1, 3) must also equal 1. The conversation also touches on the Sieve of Eratosthenes and its connection to patterns in prime and composite numbers, hinting at a complex relationship that may relate to the Riemann Hypothesis. Overall, the thread investigates deeper mathematical connections within the realm of Proth primes.
pedja
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Definition: Proth number is a number of the form :

k\cdot 2^n+1

where k is an odd positive integer and n is a positive integer such that : 2^n>k

My question : If Proth number is prime number are there some other known relations in addition to 2^n>k , between exponent n and coefficient k ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


( n \equiv 1 \pmod 2 \land n > 1) \Rightarrow \gcd(k-1,3)=1

n \equiv 0 \pmod 2 \Rightarrow \gcd(k+1,3)=1
 


I would think it has something to do with the sieve of eratosthenes, where the twin primes revolve around multiples of 6. The formula would give the lesser value for the twin primes.

A few years ago, i decided to look into the riemann hypothesis. I noticed that using the sieve of eratosthenes, there is an obvious pattern for composite numbers. The pattern gets more complex after regions of primes squared. I started to develop a formula but it got more complex with each region, and didn't seam like a good basis for an equation, so I put it off.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K