Proton Collision Feynman Diagram

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the complexities of drawing a Feynman diagram for a relativistic proton-proton collision that produces a neutral pion (π0) and its subsequent decay into two photons. Participants emphasize the importance of accurately representing particle interactions, charge conservation, and the correct depiction of fermions and antifermions. The consensus is that the initial sketch does not conform to Feynman diagram standards and that pion production is more likely to occur through strong interactions rather than the depicted process. Additionally, the discussion highlights that pions typically emerge from the decay of high-mass baryon states in high-energy collisions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman diagrams and their conventions
  • Knowledge of particle physics, specifically proton-proton interactions
  • Familiarity with the concept of charge conservation in particle interactions
  • Basic principles of particle decay, particularly neutral pions and their decay into photons
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conventions of Feynman diagrams in particle physics
  • Research the strong interaction and its role in pion production
  • Learn about baryon states and their decay processes in high-energy collisions
  • Examine the principles of charge conservation in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in understanding the intricacies of Feynman diagrams and particle interactions in high-energy collisions.

connorp
Messages
30
Reaction score
2
Supposed to represent a relativistic proton colliding with a stationary proton, leading to changes in the momentum of both and the production of a neutral pion. The pion then decays into two photons.

No clue if this is right. I've never drawn anything much more complicated than electron-positron annihilations. Any help is appreciated.

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1428543224.371581.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to make sure that your particles travel in time ... one of the product protons, for eg, travels in the -space direction and backwards in time while one of the u's appears to be stationary in the center of mass frame of the initial protons. Hmmm... don't interactions involving triangles usually sum to zero?
When you go ##u \to u + \gamma## ... are you saying that the particle spontaneously emits a photon? And why is the second u traveling backwards in time?

You are basically drawing a position-time graph ... you've been doing those since secondary school - you now how to do those.
 
I'm sorry, but what you are drawing is not a Feynman diagram. It doesn't conserve charge, and there's an arrow on the pi0.
 
Draw each fundamental fermion as a separate line with an arrow. Don't draw hadrons as single lines. Make sure the arrows point "backwards" for antifermions.

I've redrawn the π0 decay since you pretty much got it right, other than the single line for the meson itself. The oval won't be necessary on your diagram, and I didn't care for space and time axes.
 

Attachments

  • Snapshot.jpg
    Snapshot.jpg
    6.8 KB · Views: 3,796
@Simon Bridge: the pion decay is fine, apart from the drawing of the pion as mentioned before.

The proton/proton collision process does not make sense. Proton plus proton cannot give pion+Z. And the "space" axis is questionable at best. You don't know the directions the particles will fly to, and you don't want to fix it in a sketch like this.
 
Any better?
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    27.3 KB · Views: 1,905
That is an unlikely, but possible process.
 
From NASA:
"In gamma-ray astronomy, "particle-particle collision" usually means a high-energy proton, or cosmic ray, strikes another proton or atomic nucleus. This collision produces, among other things, one or more neutral pi mesons (or pions). These are unstable particles that decay into a pair of gamma rays."
I have found several other sources as well that indicate it is not a completely rare outcome from a high energy p-p collision. Maybe I'm wrong though.
 
Pions from p-p collisions are more likely to come from the decay of high mass baryon states (deltas etc. etc.) than from the kind of process you've drawn.
 
  • #10
I did not say pion production was rare, but pion production from two photons is. A production via the strong interaction is much more likely.
DaPi said:
Pions from p-p collisions are more likely to come from the decay of high mass baryon states (deltas etc. etc.) than from the kind of process you've drawn.
If the energy is sufficient most pions come from hadronization itself, not from hadron decays afterwards.
 
  • #11
connorp said:
Any better?
??
 
  • #12
I'd go with what mfb said in his last post... it's a strong interaction that will give the pion...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K