Graduate What are the different decay processes shown in this Feynman diagram?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of decay processes in a Feynman diagram related to electron-positron and photon interactions. It clarifies that while a photon can decay into an electron-positron pair, the reverse processes involving electrons and positrons do not qualify as decay due to conservation laws. The Higgs boson can decay into electron-positron pairs if its mass is sufficient, but the decay into mixed lepton pairs is restricted by lepton flavor conservation in the Standard Model. Higher-order decay processes are acknowledged but are suppressed due to the complexity of their diagrams and conservation requirements. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the nuances of particle decay processes and the constraints imposed by theoretical frameworks.
  • #31
failexam said:
I am adding that line, because each interaction vertex must have three lines popping out of it, with the Higgs for one line and the fermion and anti-fermion on the other two lines
But without having that extra higgs you still satisfy that! You just have one vertex less.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Got it!

Is this the only tree-level Feynman diagram for this process?
 
  • #33
No. You have two diagrams. One where the electron of the initial vertex is external and one where the positron is.
 
  • #34
I see! So, for a process like

$$h \rightarrow e^{+} + e^{-} + \mu^{+} + \mu^{-}$$

you have only the following two tree-level Feynman diagrams, right?

https://i.imgsafe.org/79327227a1.jpg

https://i.imgsafe.org/7932eec9b7.jpg
 
  • #35
No. You also have the diagrams where the initial vertex is with the electron line.
 
  • #36
Got it!

So, you have two tree-level Feynman diagrams for

$$h \rightarrow e^{+} + e^{-} + e^{+} + e^{-} $$

https://i.imgsafe.org/79814d363d.jpg

and four tree-level Feynman diagrams for

$$h \rightarrow e^{+} + e^{-} + \mu^{+} + \mu^{-}$$

https://i.imgsafe.org/7981a81e80.jpg

https://i.imgsafe.org/79820c6447.jpg,

right?
 
  • #37
wouldnt that work? h \rightarrow hh \rightarrow 2l 2l'?
Also these are not tree diagrams...
 
  • #38
ChrisVer said:
wouldnt that work? h \rightarrow hh \rightarrow 2l 2l'?
Also these are not tree diagrams...

Which ones are not tree-level Feynman diagrams?
 
  • #39
failexam said:
Which ones are not tree-level Feynman diagrams?
that was a conceptual mistake...
 
  • #40
Right, so all of the diagrams that I posted are tree-level diagrams, right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K