Prove 2ab<= a^2+b^2 using order axioms

  • Thread starter Thread starter whyme1010
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axioms
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the inequality 2ab ≤ a² + b² using order axioms and basic axioms for real numbers. Participants are exploring the foundational properties of real numbers in the context of this proof.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various approaches to the proof, including attempts to manipulate the expression by constructing a² + b² - 2ab and considering the implications of squaring real numbers. There is also a focus on the limitations of using certain axioms, particularly regarding the positivity of squares.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their thoughts on the validity of different approaches and questioning the use of specific axioms. Some have provided proofs for the non-negativity of squares, while others express uncertainty about the rigor of their arguments. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of using only order axioms and field axioms, which influences their reasoning and the methods they can employ in the proof.

whyme1010
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



prove 2ab<= a^2+b^2 using order axioms
Of course use of other basic axioms for real numbers are also okay.

Homework Equations


axioms for set of real numbers.


The Attempt at a Solution


The easy way to do this would be just subtract 2ab from both sides, factor, and see that (a-b)^2 is greater or equal to zero.

But we have to use the basic axioms. So I tried constructing a^2+b^2-2ab by multiplying (a-b)(a-b) using the axioms. I'm not sure I was rigorous enough. Also I'm not sure whether I can just say a square of a real number is greater than zero. Though it is easy to prove.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use only the order axioms and the field axioms. I don't think you can use squared numbers are greater than zero.
 
well then I can just prove that a^2 is always greater or equal to zero.

a>0
Then a(a)>(a)0
a^3>0

a<0
a+(-a)<0+(-a)
0<-a
-a(0)<(-a)(-a)
0<(-1)(-1)(a)(a)
0<a

a=0
a(a)=0(a)
a^2=0

So a^2 >=0
 
whyme1010 said:
well then I can just prove that a^2 is always greater or equal to zero.

a>0
Then a(a)>(a)0
a^3>0

a<0
a+(-a)<0+(-a)
0<-a
-a(0)<(-a)(-a)
0<(-1)(-1)(a)(a)
0<a

a=0
a(a)=0(a)
a^2=0

So a^2 >=0

Hmmm I guess so. did you prove that (-x)(-y)=-(xy)?
 
yeah. I also solved this by using three lemmas. =) Don't know how to close the thread though.
 
happysauce said:
Hmmm I guess so. did you prove that (-x)(-y)=-(xy)?

I sure hope he didn't.
 
Mentallic said:
I sure hope he didn't.

woops I mean (x)(-y) = -(xy)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K