MHB Prove Angle of Diagonals in Quadrilateral is Degrees

  • Thread starter Thread starter maxkor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle
maxkor
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Two angles of a square with side
c7d457e388298246adb06c587bccd419ea67f7e8.png
protrude beyond a strip of width
c7d457e388298246adb06c587bccd419ea67f7e8.png
with parallel edges. The sides of the square intersect the edges of the strip at four points. Prove that the diagonals of the quadrilateral whose vertices are these points intersect at an angle of
f27da4fca6f3fecb215974023aad210b70ec3857.png
degrees.
rys.png
 

Attachments

  • rys.png
    rys.png
    1.2 KB · Views: 199
Mathematics news on Phys.org
As in a previous problem, here is an algebraic solution. I would like to see a geometric solution giving more insight into why this result holds.
We may as well take $a=1$. Tilt the diagram so that the square becomes the unit square, and suppose that the parallel lines make an angle $\theta$ with the $x$-axis.

[TIKZ][scale=1.25]
\draw [very thick] (0,0) -- (4,0) -- (4,4) -- (0,4) -- cycle ;
\draw [very thick] (-4,0.5) -- (4,6.5) ;
\draw [very thick] (0,-1.5) -- (8,4.5) ;
\coordinate [label=left:$A$] (A) at (0,3.5) ;
\coordinate [label=above:$B$] (B) at (0.667,4) ;
\coordinate [label=right:$C$] (C) at (4,1.5) ;
\coordinate [label=below:$D$] (D) at (2,0) ;
\draw [very thick] (A) -- (C) ;
\draw [very thick] (B) -- (D) ;
\draw (2.5,0.2) node {$\theta$} ;
\draw (1.3,2.6) node {$\phi$} ;
\draw (-0.5,0) node {$(0,0)$} ;
\draw (4.5,0) node {$(1,0)$} ;
\draw (-0.5,4) node {$(0,1)$} ;
\draw (4.5,4) node {$(1,1)$} ; [/TIKZ]
The equations of the parallel lines are then of the form $y = x\tan\theta + c+d$ and $y = x\tan\theta + c-d$ for some constants $c$ and $d$. The condition that the lines form a strip of width $1$ is $2d\cos\theta = 1$. So $2d = \sec\theta$.

The points where the lines cross the sides of the square are then $$ A = (0,c+d),\qquad B = ((1-c-d)\cot\theta,1), \qquad C = (1,\tan\theta + c-d), \qquad D = ((d-c)\cot\theta,0) .$$ The slope of the line $AC$ is therefore $\tan\theta - 2d = \tan\theta - \sec\theta$.

The slope of $BD$ is $\dfrac{-1}{(2d-1)\cot\theta} = \dfrac{-\tan\theta}{\sec\theta-1}$.

It follows from the formula $\tan(\alpha - \beta) = \frac{\tan\alpha -\tan\beta}{1+ \tan\alpha\tan\beta}$ that if $\phi$ is the angle between $AC$ and $BD$ then $$\begin{aligned} \tan\phi = \frac{(\tan\theta - \sec\theta) - \frac{-\tan\theta}{\sec\theta-1}}{1 + (\tan\theta - \sec\theta) \frac{-\tan\theta}{\sec\theta-1}} &= \frac{(\sec\theta - 1)(\tan\theta - \sec\theta) + \tan\theta}{(\sec\theta - 1) - \tan\theta (\tan\theta - \sec\theta)} \\ &= \frac{\sec\theta(\tan\theta - \sec\theta + 1)}{\sec\theta(1 - \sec\theta + \tan\theta)} \\ &= 1. \end{aligned}$$ It follows that $\phi = 45^\circ$.
 
Hint
156973.png

156973.png
 
1 / α + β = 90
2 / it is enough to note that the triangles
KNP and MLQ (they have two heights of length "a") so they are isosceles
so |∡NMQ| =90 - α/2 and |∡MNP| =90 - β/2
γ=(α + β)/2=45
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top