Prove dQ is an inexact differential

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the reversible heat \( Q_R \) is not a thermodynamic property by analyzing the differential \( dQ \). The original poster references the condition for exact differentials and seeks to apply it to the context of thermodynamic properties, specifically focusing on heat and internal energy relationships.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between heat, internal energy, and entropy, questioning how to show that certain partial derivatives do not satisfy the conditions for exact differentials. There is discussion about using Maxwell relationships and the implications of expressing \( dS \) in terms of other variables.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights and suggestions for approaching the problem, including the use of Maxwell relationships and the need to express differentials in terms of state functions. There is an acknowledgment of potential errors in the original equations presented by the poster, and hints have been given to guide further exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster's approach may be complicated by assumptions related to ideal gases and the nature of state functions. There is an emphasis on the need for clarity regarding the definitions and properties of the variables involved.

arpon
Messages
234
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement


##dz=Mdx+Ndy## is an exact differential if ##(\frac{\partial M}{\partial y})_x=(\frac{\partial N}{\partial x})_y##.
By invoking the condition for an exact differential, demonstrate that the
reversible heat ##Q_R## is not a thermodynamic property.

Homework Equations


##dQ=dU+PdV##
##dU=C_VdT##

The Attempt at a Solution


##dQ=C_VdT+PdV##
So, we have to show that, ##(\frac{\partial C_V}{\partial V})_T \neq (\frac{\partial P}{\partial T})_V##
Now,
##LHS=(\frac{\partial C_V}{\partial V})_T##
##=(\frac{\partial}{\partial V}((\frac{\partial U}{\partial T})_V))_T~~~~##[##C_V=(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T})_V##]
##=(\frac{\partial}{\partial T}((\frac{\partial U}{\partial V})_T))_V~~~~## [Symmetry of second derivatives]
So, we need to show that
##(\frac{\partial U}{\partial V})_T \neq P+F(V)~~~## [where, ##F(V)## is an arbitary function of ##V##]
##(\frac{\partial U}{\partial V})_T - P \neq F(V)##

If the equation of state is given, this can easily be proved. How can I prove this in general? I also do not understand what would be the difference for irreversible heat.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just an input for you=I don't have the solution, but ## TdS=dQ_{reversible} ## so that according to the above, you should be able to show that the functional property holds for ## S ## but not for ## Q_{reversible} ##.
 
I think you should work with $$C_V=T\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_V$$ and determine the partial with respect to V at constant T. This can be expressed in terms of the equation of state parameters by applying a Maxwell relationship.
 
Chestermiller said:
I think you should work with $$C_V=T\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_V$$ and determine the partial with respect to V at constant T. This can be expressed in terms of the equation of state parameters by applying a Maxwell relationship.
I tried as you mentioned,
##\left(\frac{\partial C_V}{\partial V}\right)_T##
##=\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial V}(T\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_V)\right)_T##
##=T\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial V}(\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_V)\right)_T## ... (i)

Now,
##\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_V=\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial P}\right)_V \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_V=-\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial T}\right)_S \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_V##...(ii) [Using Maxwell relationship]
Using (i) and (ii),
##\left(\frac{\partial C_V}{\partial V}\right)_T##
##=-T\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial V}(\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial T}\right)_S \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_V)_V)\right)_T##
What should be the next steps?
 
I didn't notice before that, in your original post, your equation for dU is incorrect. Do you know what the correct relationship is?
 
You are going to kick yourself. This problem is much simpler than what you've been trying to do.

For a reversible process, dQ=TdS

Now, if you express dS in terms of dT, dV, and partials of S with respect to T and V, what do you get? What do you get if you substitute that relationship into dQ=TdS?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arpon and Charles Link
Chestermiller said:
You are going to kick yourself. This problem is much simpler than what you've been trying to do.

For a reversible process, dQ=TdS

Now, if you express dS in terms of dT, dV, and partials of S with respect to T and V, what do you get? What do you get if you substitute that relationship into dQ=TdS?
@Chestermiller I don't see an additional response from the OP yet, but your input was useful. I see when testing the criteria given by the OP in post #1, there is an extra term so that the two sides are not equal. In the case of ## dS=(1/T)(dU+PdV) ## though, the criterion is met, at least in the case of an ideal gas.
 
Chestermiller said:
I didn't notice before that, in your original post, your equation for dU is incorrect. Do you know what the correct relationship is?
Thanks for pointing out the mistake. I am used to solve problems for ideal gases, that's why I have made the mistake, I guess.

Chestermiller said:
You are going to kick yourself. This problem is much simpler than what you've been trying to do.

For a reversible process, dQ=TdS

Now, if you express dS in terms of dT, dV, and partials of S with respect to T and V, what do you get? What do you get if you substitute that relationship into dQ=TdS?

Thanks for the hints!
##dQ_R=TdS=T\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right) _V dT + T\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial V}\right) _T dV ##
So, we have to show that,
##\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial V} \left( T\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right) _V \right)\right)_T \neq \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial T} \left(T\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial V}\right) _T \right)\right )_V##
##RHS=T\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial T} \left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial V}\right) _T \right )_V + \left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial V}\right)_T##
And,
##LHS=T \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial V} \left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right) _V \right)_T##

But ##S(V,T)## is a state function of ##V## and ##T##. So ##\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial V}\right)_T \neq 0## in general.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K