Temperature dependence of Cv at very large volume

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 3K views
arpon
Messages
234
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement


In the case of a gas obeying the equation of state
$$\begin{align}\frac{Pv}{RT}&=1+\frac{B}{v}\end{align} $$
where ##B## is a function of ##T## only, show that,
$$\begin{align}c_v&=-\frac{RT}{v}\frac{d^2}{dT^2} (BT)+\left(c_v\right)_0\end{align}$$
where ##\left(c_v\right)_0## is the value at large volume.

Homework Equations


$$\begin{align}c_v&=\left(\frac{dU}{dT}\right)_v\end{align}$$
$$\begin{align}TdS &=c_v dT+ T \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_v dv \end{align}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


$$\begin{align}\left(\frac{\partial c_v}{\partial v}\right)_T & =\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial v}\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right)_v\right)_T \\
& =\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial T}\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial v}\right)_T\right)_v
\end{align}$$
Now,
$$\begin{align}dU
&=TdS-Pdv\\
& = c_v dT+ T \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_v dv - Pdv
\end{align}$$
So, we have,
$$\begin{align}
\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial v}\right)_T & = T \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_v - P
\end{align}$$

Using equation (6) & (9),
$$\begin{align}\left(\frac{\partial c_v}{\partial v}\right)_T & = \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial T}\left(T \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_v - P\right)\right)_v\\
& = T \left(\frac{\partial^2 P}{\partial T^2}\right)_v + \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_v - \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_v \\
&= T \left(\frac{\partial^2 P}{\partial T^2}\right)_v
\end{align}$$

Using the equation of state (1), we obtain,
$$\begin{align}
\left(\frac{\partial^2 P}{\partial T^2}\right)_v &= \frac{R}{v^2}\frac{d^2}{dT^2} (BT)
\end{align}$$

So, using (12) and (13), we have,
$$\begin{align}\left(\frac{\partial c_v}{\partial v}\right)_T & = \frac{RT}{v^2}\frac{d^2}{dT^2} (BT)
\end{align}$$
Now
$$\begin{align} dc_v &= \left(\frac{\partial c_v}{\partial v}\right)_T dv + \left(\frac{\partial c_v}{\partial T}\right)_v dT
\end{align}$$

Integrating from ##T=T,~V=\infty## to ##T=T,~V=V##,
$$\begin{align}c_v&=-\frac{RT}{v}\frac{d^2}{dT^2} (BT)+\left(c_v\right)_0\end{align}$$

Here, ##\left(c_v\right)_0## is the value for ##v=\infty## and ##T=T##.
My question is: Is ##\left(c_v\right)_0## independent of ##T##, and why?
 
on Phys.org
At the limit for infinite volume, the B/v term disappears, therefore the gas law gets independent of T (apart from the usual factor of T).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arpon
Then you need a different equation of state, not the one from post 1.

Actual gases often have additional complications from frozen-in degrees of freedom, dissociation and so on, but those are all not considered here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: arpon
Hmm... v->infinity is equivalent to B->0. Setting B=0 leads to c_v = c_v, so we cannot make any statement about c_v just with the given information.

Why exactly would a temperature-dependent c_v be problematic?
 
mfb said:
Hmm... v->infinity is equivalent to B->0. Setting B=0 leads to c_v = c_v, so we cannot make any statement about c_v just with the given information.
We could say that at large v, c_v is temperature-dependent. That's certainly consistent with the mathematics. We engineers (I'm an engineer), unlike physicists, regard a temperature-dependent heat capacity as a key aspect of the definition of an ideal gas. In all engineering thermodynamics books, the heat capacities of ideal gases are regarded as being temperature dependent. They are the same functions of temperature that the heat capacities of real gases approach in the limit of low pressures and high volumes. So, in this problem, ##c_{v0}(T)## would be the (temperature-dependent) heat capacity of the real gas in the ideal gas region.
Why exactly would a temperature-dependent c_v be problematic?
In my judgment, it would not be problematic at all. Rather, it would be expected.
 
Chestermiller said:
In all engineering thermodynamics books, the heat capacities of ideal gases are regarded as being temperature dependent.
Wait, what? For an ideal monoatomic gas it should be 3/2 R.
 
mfb said:
Wait, what? For an ideal monoatomic gas it should be 3/2 R.
As I said, engineers regard an ideal gas an entity which, in general, features a temperature-dependent viscosity. In the special case of an ideal monoatomic gas, the heat capacity would be virtually constant at 3/2R. For the present problem, however, no information was provided concerning the molecular nature of the gas. Therefore, it is prudent to assume that, at large specific volumes, the heat capacity can be temperature-dependent.