Prove Inequality: A,A', B, B' in [0,1]

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stevendaryl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The inequality AB + AB' + A'B ≤ A'B' + A + B holds true for real numbers A, A', B, and B' within the range [0,1]. The proof involves analyzing two regions: A + A' ≤ 1 and A + A' > 1. In the first region, the inequality simplifies to AB' ≤ A'B' + A, which is validated by examining the derivatives. In the second region, the inequality simplifies to AB' + A' ≤ A'B' + 1, which is also satisfied. The proof demonstrates that the inequality remains valid across the specified ranges without requiring exhaustive case analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real number properties within the interval [0,1]
  • Familiarity with basic calculus, specifically derivatives
  • Knowledge of inequalities and their manipulation
  • Concept of Bell's Theorem and its implications in mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study advanced inequality proofs in real analysis
  • Explore the implications of Bell's Theorem in mathematical contexts
  • Learn about derivative applications in inequality validation
  • Investigate case analysis techniques in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying real analysis, and anyone interested in advanced inequality proofs and their applications in theoretical contexts.

stevendaryl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
8,943
Reaction score
2,955
I'm pretty sure that the following is true, but I don't see an immediate compelling proof, so I'm going to throw it out as a challenge:

Let A,A', B, B' be four real numbers, each in the range [0,1]. Show that:

AB + AB' + A'B \leq A' B' + A + B

(or show a counter-example, if it's not true)

This inequality was inspired by Bell's Theorem, but that's not relevant to proving or disproving it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Consider the region ##A+A' \leq 1## first.
For B=0, the inequality simplifies to ##AB' \leq A'B'+A## which is true.
The derivatives with respect to B are ##A+A'## and ##1##, respectively, which means the derivative for the left hand side is smaller or equal. For the chosen region this means the inequality stays true for all B.

Now consider the region ##A+A' > 1##.
For B=1, the inequality simplifies to ##AB'+A' \leq A'B'+1##. As ##B'+A' \leq A'B'+1##, this inequality is satisfied.
The derivatives with respect to B are ##A+A'## and ##1##, respectively, for the chosen region the derivative on the left hand side is larger, but now we are going backwards with B. For the chosen region this means the inequality stays true for all B.For ##A=1-A'##, the inequality can be written as ##AB+AB'+(1-A)B \leq (1-A)B'+A+B## which simplifies to ##2AB' \leq B'+A##, that inequality does not depend on B and it is true with enough margin to make the derivatives work on both sides.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stevendaryl
Thanks! That's a little more elegant than the only way I found to prove it, which was to do an exhaustive case split.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K