Prove Inverse of a bijective function is also bijective

  • Thread starter Thread starter blindgibson27
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Inverse
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 6K views
blindgibson27
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that the inverse of a bijective function is also bijective.


Homework Equations



One to One
[itex]f(x_{1}) = f(x_{2}) \Leftrightarrow x_{1}=x_{2}[/itex]

Onto
[itex]\forall y \in Y \exists x \in X \mid f:X \Rightarrow Y[/itex]
[itex]y = f(x)[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


It is to proof that the inverse is a one-to-one correspondence. I think I get what you are saying though about it looking as a definition rather than a proof.

How about this..

Let [itex]f:X\rightarrow Y[/itex] be a one to one correspondence, show [itex]f^{-1}:Y\rightarrow X[/itex] is a one to one correspondence.

[itex]\exists x_{1},x_{2} \in X \mid f(x_{1}) = f(x_{2}) \Leftrightarrow x_{1}=x_{2}[/itex]

furthermore, [itex]f^{-1}(f(x_{1})) = f^{-1}(f(x_{2})) \Rightarrow f^{-1}(x_{1}) = f^{-1}(x_{1})[/itex] (by definition of function [itex]f[/itex] and one to one)

kind of stumped from this point on..
I may want to transfer this post over to the homework section though, I did post to just get a confirmation on my thoughts on bijection but it is now turning into something a bit more specific than that
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To show that [itex]f^{-1}[/itex] is an injection, we need to show that [itex]f^{-1}(x_1) = f^{-1}(x_2)[/itex] implies [itex]x_1 = x_2[/itex]. What happens if you apply [itex]f[/itex] to both sides of [itex]f^{-1}(x_1) = f^{-1}(x_2)[/itex]?
 
My thoughts are that [itex]f^{-1}[/itex] cancels by definition,

so to begin let [itex]f^{-1}(x_{1}) = f^{-1}(x_{2})[/itex]
[itex]\Leftrightarrow f(f^{-1}(x_{1})) = f(f^{-1}(x_{2}))[/itex] since [itex]\forall y \in Y[/itex] the function [itex]f^{-1}(y) = x[/itex] for some [itex]x \in X[/itex]
[itex]\Leftrightarrow x_{1} = x_{2}[/itex]
 
Last edited:
Yes, that is correct and shows that, because f is injective, so is [itex]f^{-1}[/itex].

To show that [itex]f^{-1}[/itex] is surjective, you want to prove that, for any x in X, there exist y in Y such that [tex]x= f^{-1}(y)[/tex].

Given any x in X, let y= f(x). Then use the other direction: [itex]f^{-1}(y)= f^{-1}(f(x))= x[/itex].
 
many thanks HallsofIvy