Prove Inverse of a bijective function is also bijective

In summary, to prove that the inverse of a bijective function is also bijective, we must show that it is both injective and surjective. To show injectivity, we can use the definition of a function and the fact that f is injective. To show surjectivity, we can use the definition of a function and the fact that f is surjective.
  • #1
blindgibson27
7
0

Homework Statement



Prove that the inverse of a bijective function is also bijective.


Homework Equations



One to One
[itex]f(x_{1}) = f(x_{2}) \Leftrightarrow x_{1}=x_{2} [/itex]

Onto
[itex] \forall y \in Y \exists x \in X \mid f:X \Rightarrow Y[/itex]
[itex]y = f(x)[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


It is to proof that the inverse is a one-to-one correspondence. I think I get what you are saying though about it looking as a definition rather than a proof.

How about this..

Let [itex]f:X\rightarrow Y[/itex] be a one to one correspondence, show [itex]f^{-1}:Y\rightarrow X[/itex] is a one to one correspondence.

[itex] \exists x_{1},x_{2} \in X \mid f(x_{1}) = f(x_{2}) \Leftrightarrow x_{1}=x_{2} [/itex]

furthermore, [itex]f^{-1}(f(x_{1})) = f^{-1}(f(x_{2})) \Rightarrow f^{-1}(x_{1}) = f^{-1}(x_{1})[/itex] (by definition of function [itex]f[/itex] and one to one)

kind of stumped from this point on..
I may want to transfer this post over to the homework section though, I did post to just get a confirmation on my thoughts on bijection but it is now turning into something a bit more specific than that
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
To show that [itex]f^{-1}[/itex] is an injection, we need to show that [itex]f^{-1}(x_1) = f^{-1}(x_2)[/itex] implies [itex]x_1 = x_2[/itex]. What happens if you apply [itex]f[/itex] to both sides of [itex]f^{-1}(x_1) = f^{-1}(x_2)[/itex]?
 
  • #3
My thoughts are that [itex]f^{-1}[/itex] cancels by definition,

so to begin let [itex]f^{-1}(x_{1}) = f^{-1}(x_{2})[/itex]
[itex]\Leftrightarrow f(f^{-1}(x_{1})) = f(f^{-1}(x_{2}))[/itex] since [itex]\forall y \in Y[/itex] the function [itex]f^{-1}(y) = x [/itex] for some [itex]x \in X[/itex]
[itex]\Leftrightarrow x_{1} = x_{2}[/itex]
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Yes, that is correct and shows that, because f is injective, so is [itex]f^{-1}[/itex].

To show that [itex]f^{-1}[/itex] is surjective, you want to prove that, for any x in X, there exist y in Y such that [tex]x= f^{-1}(y)[/tex].

Given any x in X, let y= f(x). Then use the other direction: [itex]f^{-1}(y)= f^{-1}(f(x))= x[/itex].
 
  • #5
many thanks HallsofIvy
 

FAQ: Prove Inverse of a bijective function is also bijective

What is a bijective function?

A bijective function is a type of function in mathematics where every element in the domain has a unique corresponding element in the range, and vice versa. This means that each input has exactly one output, and each output has exactly one input.

How is the inverse of a bijective function defined?

The inverse of a bijective function is a function that reverses the mapping of the original function, essentially swapping the input and output values. This is denoted as f-1(x), where f(x) is the original bijective function.

Why is it important to prove the inverse of a bijective function is also bijective?

Proving that the inverse of a bijective function is also bijective is important because it ensures that the function is well-defined and that the inverse function exists. It also allows for the use of the inverse function in solving equations and finding the original input value from a given output.

Can the inverse of a bijective function be non-bijective?

No, the inverse of a bijective function can never be non-bijective. This is because a bijective function is a one-to-one and onto function, meaning that every element in the domain is mapped to a unique element in the range and vice versa. Therefore, the inverse function must also be one-to-one and onto, making it bijective.

How do you prove the inverse of a bijective function is bijective?

To prove that the inverse of a bijective function is bijective, you must show that it is both one-to-one and onto. This can be done by showing that the function is injective (one-to-one) and surjective (onto) using various mathematical techniques such as direct proof, proof by contradiction, or proof by contrapositive.

Back
Top