Prove Invertibility of T^3 + 2T^2 -3T on R^6

  • Thread starter Thread starter JG89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the invertibility of the linear operator expression T^3 + 2T^2 - 3T on R^6, given the characteristic polynomial f(t) = (t-4)(t+1)^3(t-2)^2. It is established that T is invertible since zero is not an eigenvalue. The eigenvalues of the operator U, derived from T, are confirmed to be 24, -1, and 8, which do not include 3, thereby confirming that T^3 + 2T^2 - 3T is indeed invertible. The conclusion is reached by demonstrating that the null space contains only the zero vector.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear operators on vector spaces
  • Familiarity with characteristic polynomials and eigenvalues
  • Knowledge of null spaces and invertibility criteria
  • Proficiency in manipulating polynomial expressions in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in linear algebra
  • Learn about the implications of the Cayley-Hamilton theorem
  • Explore the relationship between characteristic polynomials and matrix diagonalization
  • Investigate the concepts of algebraic and geometric multiplicity of eigenvalues
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on linear algebra, eigenvalue problems, and operator theory. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to understand the conditions for invertibility of linear transformations.

JG89
Messages
724
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Let T be a linear operator on [tex]R^6[/tex] whose characteristic polynomial is [tex]f(t) = (t-4)(t+1)^3 (t-2)^2[/tex]. Show that [tex]T^3 + 2T^2 -3T[/tex] is invertible.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, T is invertible since 0 is not an eigenvalue of T. [tex]T^3 +2T^2 -3T[/tex] is invertible if and only if zero is not an eigenvalue of T, and this means that the only vector in the null space is the zero vector. Suppose that there was a non-zero vector, [tex]x'[/tex], in the null space. Then we have [tex]T^3(x') +2T^2(x') -3T(x') = 0[/tex] then after applying [tex]T^{-1}[/tex] to both sides, we have [tex]T^3(x') + 2T^2(x') - 3T(x') = T^2(x') + 2T(x') -3x' \Rightarrow U(x') = T^2(x') + 2T(x') = 3x'[/tex] and so we see that 3 is an eigenvalue of U.

Now, I know from the characteristic polynomial that T's eigenvalues are [tex]\lambda_1 = 4, \lambda_2 = -1, \lambda_3 = 2[/tex].

For [tex]\lambda_1 = 4[/tex] corresponding to some vector x'_1,

[tex]U(x'_1) = T^2(x'_1) + 2T(x'_1) = T(4x'_1) + 8x'_1 = 16x'_1 + 8x'_1 = 24x'_1[/tex].

Through similar methods, we can show that 24, -1, and 8 are eigenvalues of U.

Now here is where I get stuck. If this means that the ONLY eigenvalues of U is 24, -1, and 8, then since 3 isn't an eigenvalue of U, then T^3 + 2T^2 - 2T has no nonzero vector in its null-space and so it is invertible.

But if this means that 24, -1, and 8 are might only be some of the eigenvalues of U, then I can't conclude that 3 isn't an eigenvalue of U. I was thinking if I could prove that the algebraic multiplicity's of 24, -1, and 8 add up to 6, then since this is an operator on R^6 these would be the only eigenvalues of U, concluding my proof.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have (T^3+2T^2-3T)x=0, doesn't that mean (T+3)(T-1)Tx=0? Doesn't that mean T HAS to have a nontrivial eigenvector with eigenvalue either 0, 1 or -3? Aren't all of those incompatible with the characteristic polynomial? Aren't you overcomplicating this?
 
I never even thought about factoring that. Wow
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K