(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); 1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

It is given that the limit as x->a of ( f(x)/(x-a) ) is 3. Prove using the espilon-delta theorem of limit that the limit as x->a of f(x) is 0.

3. The attempt at a solution

so it is known that: |( f(x)/(x-a) ) - 3| < E_{1}when |x-a| < d_{1}

therefore:

|( f(x)/(x-a) ) - 3| ≤ |f(x)/(x-a)|+3 < E_{1}

|f(x)| < (E_{1}-3)|x-a|

(E_{1}-3)|x-a| ≤ C(E-3)

|x-a| ≤ 1=C

|f(x)| < (E_{1}-3) when d_{1}=min{ 1, (E-3) }

and we have to prove that |f(x)-0| < E when |x-a| < d

so can i just say that:

|f(x)-0| < E_{2}

|f(x)| < E_{2}when |x-a| < d_{2}

So E_{2}=E_{1}-3 and d_{2}=d_{1}=min{ 1, (E-3) }

So |f(x)-0| < E_{1}-3 when |x-a| < d_{1}

is this right? i am not sure if i am making any logical sense in equating the two epsilons?

my intuition tells me that f(x) is zero at "a" because for f(x)/x-a to have a limit at "a", f(x) must be a factor of (x-a) so as to cancel out with the denominator. so if f(x)=(x-a)(p(x)), then f(a)=0, but i am not sure how to prove that using epsilon-delta, and i am not even sure if f(x) HAS to be a factor of (x-a)...sinx/x after all has a limit at 0 but sinx doesnt cancel with x.

help? :D

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Prove lim f(x) as x approaches a is 0?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**