MHB Prove Moment of Inertia of Annulus w/ Radii 3m & 1m: 5m

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the moment of inertia of a uniform annulus with inner radius 1 meter and outer radius 3 meters. The area of the annulus is calculated, leading to the mass per unit area and the mass of a differential ring within the annulus. By applying integration techniques, the moment of inertia is derived using the formula I = (2M/(R^2 - r^2))∫x^3dx. After performing the integration and substituting the given values, it is confirmed that the moment of inertia equals 5m. The calculations and reasoning validate the initial claim regarding the moment of inertia of the annulus.
markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
a uniform annulus consists of disc of radius 3 meters with a disc of radius 1 meters removed from its center. the mass of the annulus is m. Prove that the moment of inertia of the annulus about an axis through its center is 5m.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Consider an annulus whose inner radius is $r$ and outer radius is $R$, and has mass $M$. The area of the face of the annulus is:

$$A=\pi\left(R^2-r^2\right)$$

The mass per unit area is:

$$M_A=\frac{M}{A}=\frac{M}{\pi\left(R^2-r^2\right)}$$

Next, consider a ring within the annulus having inner radius $x$ and outer radius $x+dx$. The mass of this ring is:

$$M_R=\frac{2M}{R^2-r^2}x\,dx$$

We know the moment of inertia for this ring is:

$$I_R=\frac{2M}{R^2-r^2}x\cdot x^2\,dx$$

And so the moment of inertia for the annulus is:

$$I=\frac{2M}{R^2-r^2}\int_r^R x^3\,dx$$

Can you proceed to carry out the integration and derive the formula into which you can put the given values for $r$ and $R$?
 
i don't really know how to continue could you show me.
 
markosheehan said:
i don't really know how to continue could you show me.

Okay, we have:

$$I=\frac{2M}{R^2-r^2}\int_r^R x^3\,dx$$

So, we may apply the power rule:

$$\int u^r\,du=\frac{u^{r+1}}{r+1}+C$$ where $$r\ne-1$$

And the anti-derivative form of the FTOC:

$$\int_a^b f(u)\,du=F(b)-F(a)$$

And we obtain:

$$I=\frac{2M}{R^2-r^2}\left[\frac{x^4}{4}\right]_r^R=\frac{M}{2\left(R^2-r^2\right)}\left[x^4\right]_r^R=\frac{M}{2\left(R^2-r^2\right)}\left(R^4-r^4\right)=\frac{M}{2}\left(R^2+r^2\right)$$

Now, we are given:

$$r=1,\,R=3,\,M=m$$

And so:

$$I=\frac{m}{2}\left(3^2+1^2\right)=5m$$

Does that make sense?
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
1K