Prove: n*x^(n-1)(x-y)>=x^n-y^n for n>0

  • Thread starter Thread starter amarch
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving the inequality n*x^(n-1)(x-y) ≥ x^n - y^n for real numbers x and y, where x is greater than y and n is a positive integer. The context is rooted in mathematical induction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of mathematical induction, including base cases and inductive steps. There are attempts to simplify expressions and explore substitutions based on the condition x > y. Some participants express uncertainty about how to proceed with the proof.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering suggestions for substitutions and simplifications. There is a recognition of the need to demonstrate the base case and clarify the inductive step, but no consensus has been reached on the final approach.

Contextual Notes

There is a specific instruction not to use the polynomial factorization property of x^n - y^n, which adds a constraint to the problem-solving process. Participants are navigating this restriction while trying to maintain the integrity of the proof.

amarch
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



for reals x and y with x greater than y, prove that n*x^(n-1)(x-y)>=x^n-y^n for n>0.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Let p(n) be that the statement is true for some n.
base case: obviously follows

inductive step: assume p(k) is true for some k.
Look at (n+1)x^(n-1+1)(a-b) = (n*x^n+x^n)(x-y)
= n*x*x^n - n*y*x^n+x*x^n-y*x^n

I'm stuck here. I know there is a way to do it using the property (x^n-y^n) = (x-y)(some polynomial), but we were specifically asked not to use that and to do it by induction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
amarch said:

Homework Statement



for reals x and y with x greater than y, prove that n*x^(n-1)(x-y)>=x^n-y^n for n>0.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Let p(n) be that the statement is true for some n.
base case: obviously follows

inductive step: assume p(k) is true for some k.
Look at (n+1)x^(n-1+1)(a-b) = (n*x^n+x^n)(x-y)
= n*x*x^n - n*y*x^n+x*x^n-y*x^n

I'm stuck here. I know there is a way to do it using the property (x^n-y^n) = (x-y)(some polynomial), but we were specifically asked not to use that and to do it by induction.

You need to use ##x > y## at this point. Your first and third term can be simplified. Also, in the formal proof you need to show the base case and mention ##p(k+1)##. I also noticed a minor typo with the ##a-b##, but I'm sure that is all it was.

Edit: You should change your ##n## variables to ##k## after introducing ##p(k)##.
 
Yeah I'll show the base case and such details in the formal write up, it's really this step where I am stuck.

So I simplified it to:

k*x^(k+1)-k*y*x^k+x^(k+1)-y*x^k

What am I supposed to do with x>y?
 
Last edited:
Try to do a substitution using ##x > y## so that two terms cancel out and you create an inequality. i.e. either plug in ##x## for ##y## or vice versa for one of the terms. The step after that is similar.
 
can we say

k*x^(k+1)-k*y*x^k+x^(k+1)-y*x^k > k*x^(k+1)-k*y*x^k since x>y?
 
amarch said:
can we say

k*x^(k+1)-k*y*x^k+x^(k+1)-y*x^k > k*x^(k+1)-k*y*x^k since x>y?

Absolutely. You substituted in ##y## for one of the ##x## in the ##+x^{k+1}## term so the result is smaller than the original equation (because you were adding the term) and then they canceled. Can you do something similar for the next step?
 
I don't see what to do here. If we take k*x^(k+1)-k*y*x^k and did the same thing wouldn't we just get zero?
 
Depending on the substitution you do, yes, you could end up with 0. That's obviously not what you want though. The goal in this proof by induction is to end up with the inequality ##\geq x^{k+1} - y^{k+1}##. What substitution can you do to make it look like that? (You aren't done just yet, almost there!)
 
I suspected I should substitute y into x in the second term of kx^(k+1)-ky*x^k, but wouldn't that not work since we would be subtracting a smaller number than before?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
never mind, I figured it out. thanks for all your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K