MHB Prove Nonzero Integer Lemma in $F[t, t^{-1}]$

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I want to prove the following lemma:

Let $F[t,t^{-1}]$ be the ring of the polynomials in $t$ and $t^{-1}$ with coefficients in the field $F$ and assume that the characteristic of $F$ is zero.
Then for any $n$ in $F[t, t^{-1}]$, $n$ is a nonzero integer if and only if
  • $n$ divides $1$
  • either $n-1$ divides $1$ or $n+1$ divides $1$, and
  • there is a power $x$ of $t$, so that $\dfrac{x-1}{t-1}\equiv n \pmod {t-1}$

I need some help to prove the direct direction...

We suppose that $n \in F[t, t^{-1}] \land n \in \mathbb{Z}\setminus \{0\}$.

That means that $n$ is a nonzero constant polynomial of $F[t, t^{-1}]$. Since $F$ is a field, $n$ is invertible, i.e., $n \mid 1$.

Is this correct so far?

How can we show the other two points?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the proof as follows?

From an other lemma we have that $(t^n-1)/(t-1)\equiv n \pmod {t-1} \tag {1}$.

Direct:

Let $n \in \mathbb{Z} \setminus \{0\}$, then $n \mid 1$, since $F$ is a field.

It also holds that $n-1 \mid 1$ or $n+1 \mid 1$, otherwise it would be $n-1=0 \Rightarrow n=1$ and $n+1=0 \Rightarrow n=-1$.

From the relation $(1)$ we have that $(t^n-1)/(t-1)\equiv n \pmod {t-1}$, so there is a power $x$ of $t$ such that $(x-1)/(t-1)\equiv n \pmod {t-1}$.

Converse:

We suppose that $n\in F[t,t^{-1}]$ and $n \mid 1$ and $( n-1 \mid 1 \text{ or } n+1 \mid 1 )$ and $(t^k-1)/(t-1)\equiv n \mod (t-1)$.

Since $n\in F[t,t^{-1}]$ is invertible ($n \mid 1$) we have that $n=at^i$, where $a \in F \setminus \{0\}, i \in \mathbb{Z}$.

Since also $n-1$ or $n+1$ is invertible ($ n-1 \mid 1 \text{ or } n+1 \mid 1 $) we have that
$$n-1=b_1t^{j_1}, b_1\in F \setminus \{0\}, j_1 \in \mathbb{Z} \Rightarrow at^i-1=b_1t^{j_1} \\ \text{ or } \\ n-1=b_2t^{j_2}, b_2\in F \setminus \{0\}, j_2 \in \mathbb{Z} \Rightarrow at^i-1=b_2t^{j_2}$$

If $i \neq 0$, then $at^i \pm 1$ has a nonzero root , which is not a root of $bt^j, b \in \{b_1, b_2 \}, j \in \{j_1, j_2 \}$.

So, it must be $i=0$.

So, $n=a \in F \setminus \{0\}$.

Since $(t^k-1)/(t-1)\equiv n \mod (t-1), k \in \mathbb{Z}$ we have that $$k \equiv n \mod (t-1) \Rightarrow n-k \equiv 0 \mod (t-1) \Rightarrow \exists y \in F[t, t^{-1}]: n-k=y(t-1) \Rightarrow n=k+y(t-1)$$
Since $n \in F\setminus \{0\}$, we have that $n$ is nonzero constant polynomial, so it must be $y=0$.

So, we have that $n=k \in \mathbb{Z} \setminus \{0\}$. Is this correct? Could I improve something?
 
mathmari said:
If $i \neq 0$, then $at^i \pm 1$ has a nonzero root , which is not a root of $bt^j, b \in \{b_1, b_2 \}, j \in \{j_1, j_2 \}$.

Is this root in $F$ or in an extension of $F$ ?
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top