Prove Nonzero Integer Lemma in $F[t, t^{-1}]$

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The lemma states that for any nonzero integer \( n \) in the ring \( F[t, t^{-1}] \), it holds that \( n \) divides \( 1 \), either \( n-1 \) or \( n+1 \) divides \( 1 \), and there exists a power \( x \) of \( t \) such that \( \frac{x-1}{t-1} \equiv n \pmod{t-1} \). The proof confirms that if \( n \) is a nonzero constant polynomial, it is invertible, thus \( n \mid 1 \). Additionally, the conditions for \( n-1 \) or \( n+1 \) to also divide \( 1 \) are established, leading to the conclusion that \( n \) must be a nonzero integer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial rings, specifically \( F[t, t^{-1}] \)
  • Knowledge of integer properties in algebraic structures
  • Familiarity with modular arithmetic and congruences
  • Basic concepts of fields and invertibility in algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of polynomial rings, focusing on \( F[t, t^{-1}] \)
  • Learn about the implications of invertibility in fields and rings
  • Research modular arithmetic and its applications in algebra
  • Explore related lemmas and theorems in algebraic structures involving integers
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying abstract algebra, particularly those interested in polynomial rings and integer properties within algebraic structures.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I want to prove the following lemma:

Let $F[t,t^{-1}]$ be the ring of the polynomials in $t$ and $t^{-1}$ with coefficients in the field $F$ and assume that the characteristic of $F$ is zero.
Then for any $n$ in $F[t, t^{-1}]$, $n$ is a nonzero integer if and only if
  • $n$ divides $1$
  • either $n-1$ divides $1$ or $n+1$ divides $1$, and
  • there is a power $x$ of $t$, so that $\dfrac{x-1}{t-1}\equiv n \pmod {t-1}$

I need some help to prove the direct direction...

We suppose that $n \in F[t, t^{-1}] \land n \in \mathbb{Z}\setminus \{0\}$.

That means that $n$ is a nonzero constant polynomial of $F[t, t^{-1}]$. Since $F$ is a field, $n$ is invertible, i.e., $n \mid 1$.

Is this correct so far?

How can we show the other two points?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the proof as follows?

From an other lemma we have that $(t^n-1)/(t-1)\equiv n \pmod {t-1} \tag {1}$.

Direct:

Let $n \in \mathbb{Z} \setminus \{0\}$, then $n \mid 1$, since $F$ is a field.

It also holds that $n-1 \mid 1$ or $n+1 \mid 1$, otherwise it would be $n-1=0 \Rightarrow n=1$ and $n+1=0 \Rightarrow n=-1$.

From the relation $(1)$ we have that $(t^n-1)/(t-1)\equiv n \pmod {t-1}$, so there is a power $x$ of $t$ such that $(x-1)/(t-1)\equiv n \pmod {t-1}$.

Converse:

We suppose that $n\in F[t,t^{-1}]$ and $n \mid 1$ and $( n-1 \mid 1 \text{ or } n+1 \mid 1 )$ and $(t^k-1)/(t-1)\equiv n \mod (t-1)$.

Since $n\in F[t,t^{-1}]$ is invertible ($n \mid 1$) we have that $n=at^i$, where $a \in F \setminus \{0\}, i \in \mathbb{Z}$.

Since also $n-1$ or $n+1$ is invertible ($ n-1 \mid 1 \text{ or } n+1 \mid 1 $) we have that
$$n-1=b_1t^{j_1}, b_1\in F \setminus \{0\}, j_1 \in \mathbb{Z} \Rightarrow at^i-1=b_1t^{j_1} \\ \text{ or } \\ n-1=b_2t^{j_2}, b_2\in F \setminus \{0\}, j_2 \in \mathbb{Z} \Rightarrow at^i-1=b_2t^{j_2}$$

If $i \neq 0$, then $at^i \pm 1$ has a nonzero root , which is not a root of $bt^j, b \in \{b_1, b_2 \}, j \in \{j_1, j_2 \}$.

So, it must be $i=0$.

So, $n=a \in F \setminus \{0\}$.

Since $(t^k-1)/(t-1)\equiv n \mod (t-1), k \in \mathbb{Z}$ we have that $$k \equiv n \mod (t-1) \Rightarrow n-k \equiv 0 \mod (t-1) \Rightarrow \exists y \in F[t, t^{-1}]: n-k=y(t-1) \Rightarrow n=k+y(t-1)$$
Since $n \in F\setminus \{0\}$, we have that $n$ is nonzero constant polynomial, so it must be $y=0$.

So, we have that $n=k \in \mathbb{Z} \setminus \{0\}$. Is this correct? Could I improve something?
 
mathmari said:
If $i \neq 0$, then $at^i \pm 1$ has a nonzero root , which is not a root of $bt^j, b \in \{b_1, b_2 \}, j \in \{j_1, j_2 \}$.

Is this root in $F$ or in an extension of $F$ ?
 

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K