Prove only using Fourier Series

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the identity \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^4} = \frac{\pi^4}{90}\) using Fourier Series, specifically through the functions \(f(x) = x^2\) and \(f(x) = x^4\). The user successfully derives \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}\) from the Fourier Series of \(f(x) = x^2\) and attempts to extend this to \(f(x) = x^4\) to find the desired result. The conversation highlights the importance of recognizing relationships between Fourier Series of different functions and leveraging previously established results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier Series and their coefficients
  • Familiarity with the Riemann Zeta Function, specifically \(\zeta(2)\) and \(\zeta(4)\)
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration techniques
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities and properties of cosine functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Fourier Series coefficients for even functions
  • Explore the relationship between Fourier Series and the Riemann Zeta Function
  • Investigate the application of Fourier Analysis in solving series summations
  • Learn about hypergeometric functions and their connection to series proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in advanced calculus and series analysis, particularly those working with Fourier Analysis and its applications in proving mathematical identities.

Oxymoron
Messages
868
Reaction score
0
Prove only using Fourier Series!

By considering the Fourier Series of f(x)=x^2 prove that

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^4} = \frac{\pi^4}{90}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, so I considered the Fourier Series of f(x)=x^2 and found that

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}

Here is how I did it

a_0 = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}x^2dx = \frac{2\pi^2}{3} = \frac{2\pi^{2m}}{2m+1} when m = 1

a_0 = \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}x^2\cos(nx)dx = \frac{4}{n^2}(-1)^n

Since the function is even, b_n = 0.

Hence the Fourier Series can be written explicitly as

x^2 = \frac{\pi^2n}{2n+1} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_n \cos(nx)

And since n=1 we have

x^2 = \frac{\pi^2}{3} + 4\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n\cos(nx)}{n^2}

Since x \equiv \pi we know \cos(nx)=(-1)^n, so

\pi^2 = \frac{\pi^2}{3} + 4\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^2}

and rearranging

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{6} = \zeta(2)
 
Last edited:
Then I tried to do the same for f(x)=x^4, for the reason that now n=2 and I will have an expression for \sum\frac{1}{n^4}. I came close, but not close enough.

I know that

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} = \frac{\pi^4}{90} = \zeta(4)

but I am only allowed to use results from Fourier Analysis. Is there anyone who can help? Or perhaps has an idea?
 
I am not sure I am 100% correct but what I got is slightly different from what we need.
We have
\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}

If we consider the Fourier series of f(x)=x^4

x^4 = \frac{\pi}{5} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^n \left( \frac{8 \pi^2}{n^2} - \frac{48}{n^4 \pi} \right) \cos(nx)

when x = \pi,

\pi^4 = \frac{\pi^4}{5} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \left( \frac{8 \pi^2}{n^2} - \frac{48}{n^4 \pi} \right)

rearraging,

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^4} = \frac{8\pi^4}{15} \times \frac{\pi}{48}=\frac{\pi^5}{90}
 
a_0 = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}x^2dx = \frac{2\pi^2}{3} = \frac{2\pi^{2m}}{2m+1}

If this is a0 WHAT is "m"?

Same question: if
x^2 = \frac{\pi^2n}{2n+1} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_n \cos(nx)

What does the "n" in the term before the sum mean?
 
I think I really made a mistake. The Fourier series of x^4 should be:

x^4 = \frac{\pi^4}{5} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \left( (-1)^n \frac{8(n^2\pi^2-6)}{n^4} \cos(nx) \right)

then put x = \pi, the result follows
 
Sorry HallsovIvy, the n in the term before the sum should be "m". The m's are not summed, but the n's are - as you probably can guess.
 
Kelvin, that's is the same Fourier Series as I got. However I can't see the connection between the two. I've played around with substituting \pi for x, but I cannot get the required result.

Is there any chance you (or someone else) could post the last remaining steps in this proof for me.
 
Kelvin said:
I think I really made a mistake. The Fourier series of x^4 should be:

x^4 = \frac{\pi^4}{5} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \left( (-1)^n \frac{8(n^2\pi^2-6)}{n^4} \cos(nx) \right)

then put x = \pi, the result follows

so putting x=\pi,

\pi^4 = \frac{\pi^4}{5} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \left( (-1)^n \frac{8(n^2\pi^2-6)}{n^4} (-1)^n \right)

\frac{4\pi^4}{5} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \left( \frac{8(n^2\pi^2-6)}{n^4} \right)

\frac{4\pi^4}{5} = 8\pi^2 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^2} - 48 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^4}

using the result that

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^4} = \frac{8\pi^4}{15} \times \frac{1}{48}=\frac{\pi^4}{90}
 
  • #10
OMG! I forgot that I could use the result from the first part ! Thanks Kelvin.

I wonder if anyone here knows how to do it the "easy" way? You know, using the general hypergeometric function. I'd be impressed! :0
 
  • #11
Oxymoron said:
OMG! I forgot that I could use the result from the first part ! Thanks Kelvin.

I wonder if anyone here knows how to do it the "easy" way? You know, using the general hypergeometric function. I'd be impressed! :0

Maybe I am missing something, but I am wondering how showing the result based on the Fourier series of f(x)=x^4 is satisfying the problem you originally posed

Oxymoron said:
By considering the Fourier Series of f(x)=x^2 prove that

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^4} = \frac{\pi^4}{90}

Did you state the problem incorrectly? Is there some simple connection between the series for f(x)=x^4 and f(x)=x^2 that I am missing? OR does the original problems still need to be solved?
 
  • #12
OlderDan,

From what I can gather, the question asked to to find a Fourier series for a particular function, then notice that it looked almost like what we wanted. Then it required a little but of imagination to guess that the actual answer we want will require us to find the Fourier series of a slightly different function. Lo and behold, f(x) = x^4 does the trick because you get the \sum\frac{1}{n^4} instead of the \sum\frac{1}{n^2} you get from the Fourier series of f(x) = x^2.

I thought was that this was going to be hard to solve, since I haven't been formally introduced to the Riemann Zeta Function (which is \zeta(4) = \frac{\pi^4}{90}). But in hindsight, the Fourier analysis involved is not far above second year uni.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
864
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K