MHB Prove Probability: Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niamh1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability Proof
Niamh1
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
View attachment 6593

Prove the following

I literally have no idea where to start or what to do.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (189).png
    Screenshot (189).png
    2.4 KB · Views: 100
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi there. :)

The binomial theorem states that $$(x+y)^n = \sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{n}{k}x^ky^{n-k}$$. What happens if you let $x=1$ and $y=1$?
 
Jameson said:
Hi there. :)

The binomial theorem states that $$(x+y)^n = \sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{n}{k}x^ky^{n-k}$$. What happens if you let $x=1$ and $y=1$?

Doesn't really help me to be honest.
 
Hi Niamh,

Let $S = \sum_{r = 1}^n r\binom{n}{r}$. Then

$$S = 0\binom{n}{0} + 1\binom{n}{1} + 2\binom{n}{2} + \cdots + (n-1)\binom{n}{n-1} + n\binom{n}{n}$$
$$S = n\binom{n}{n} + (n-1)\binom{n}{n-1} + \cdots + 1\binom{n}{1} + 0\binom{n}{0}$$

Using the fact that $\binom{n}{r} = \binom{n}{n-r}$ for $0 \le r \le n$, add the two equations column-wise, then use the binomial theorem, to obtain $2S = n2^n$. Dividing by $2$ yields the result.
 
Here's another easy proof using calculus:

$$(x+1)^n=\sum_{r=0}^n{{n}\choose{r}}x^r$$

Take derivatives:

$$n(x+1)^{n-1}=\sum_{r=1}^nr{{n}\choose{r}}x^{r-1}$$

Eavaluate at x=1:

$$n2^{n-1}=\sum_{r=1}^nr{{n}\choose{r}}=\sum_{r=0}^nr{{n}\choose{r}}$$
 
Niamh said:
Doesn't really help me to be honest.

Hi Niamh,

My post and the two below show the main connection you need, that is how to connect the summation sign to something resembling $2^n$. At first glance this is a quite strange equation and the key is the binomial theorem as I mentioned. If you let $x=1$ and $y=1$ you get:

$$(x+y)^n =(1+1)^n=2^n= \sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{n}{k}x^ky^{n-k}=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{n}{k}1^k1^{n-k}=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{n}{k}$$

Using this trick we have now connected $2^n$ to something with this summation. That was the idea behind my post. :)

What have you tried?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top