MHB Prove Quadrilateral Divider: Equal Area & Perimeter

  • Thread starter Thread starter SatyaDas
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
For any quadrilateral, there exists at least one straight line that can divide it into two equal parts in both area and perimeter. The discussion highlights the need for a proof of this statement, with participants sharing their attempts and solutions. Clarity in the wording of the problem is emphasized, as some find it challenging to grasp initially. The thread has been moved to a more appropriate forum for mathematical challenges. This topic invites further exploration of geometric properties and proofs related to quadrilaterals.
SatyaDas
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Prove that for any quadrilateral there exists at least one straight line that divides the given quadrilateral into 2 equal parts in area and perimeter.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I realized I asked in the wrong forum. Don't know how to delete it.
 
Moved to Challenge Questions and Puzzles, assuming that was the intended destination.
 
Satya said:
Prove that for any quadrilateral there exists at least one straight line that divides the given quadrilateral into 2 equal parts in area and perimeter.
My attempt.
Every line through the centroid of the quadrilateral divides the area into 2 equal halves.
Consider the function that maps the angle of a line through the centroid to the perimeter on one side minus half the total perimeter.
Over a full period, this function is either the zero function, or it has positive maxima with corresponding negative minima.
If it is the zero function, we are done, since any line through the centroid divides the perimeter into 2 equal halves.
So assume that at least 1 positive maximum exists, which means that the perimeter on one side is greater than the perimeter on the other side.
Then there must be a corresponding negative minimum at a distance of half a period from that maximum.
So according to the intermediate value theorem, the function must take the value 0 somewhere between that maximum and minimum.
QED.
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
My attempt.
Every line through the centroid of the quadrilateral divides the area into 2 equal halves.
Consider the function that maps the angle of a line through the centroid to the perimeter on one side minus half the total perimeter.
Over a full period, this function is either the zero function, or it has positive maxima with corresponding negative minima.
If it is the zero function, we are done, since any line through the centroid divides the perimeter into 2 equal halves.
So assume that at least 1 positive maximum exists, which means that the perimeter on one side is greater than the perimeter on the other side.
Then there must be a corresponding negative minimum at a distance of half a period from that maximum.
So according to the intermediate value theorem, the function must take the value 0 somewhere between that maximum and minimum.
QED.

I think this is right solution. Only thing is that I needed to read it multiple times to understand the wordings. :)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top