Prove Riemann Integrability: Let f:[0,1]->R

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Riemann
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the Riemann integrability of a bounded function f:[0,1] that is continuous on (0,1). The key argument involves demonstrating that for any ε > 0, there exists a partition P of [0,1] such that the difference between the upper and lower sums, U(f,P) - L(f,P), is less than ε. The participants emphasize the importance of uniform continuity on subintervals and the use of limit superior to establish integrability. The final conclusion is that the constructed partition allows for the necessary inequalities to hold, confirming Riemann integrability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann integrability and its criteria
  • Familiarity with concepts of upper and lower sums (U(f,P) and L(f,P))
  • Knowledge of uniform continuity and its implications for integrability
  • Basic proficiency in limits and limit superior (lim sup) in real analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Riemann integrable functions and their characteristics
  • Learn about the implications of uniform continuity on integrability
  • Explore the concept of limit superior and its applications in analysis
  • Investigate the relationship between bounded functions and their integrability on closed intervals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis, educators teaching calculus concepts, and researchers interested in the properties of integrable functions.

mathster
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Let f:[0,1]-> R be bounded on [0,1] and continuous on (0,1). Prove that f is Riemann integrable on [0,1]. Hint: Show that for any epsilon > 0 there exists a partition P of [0,1] such that U(f,P)-L(f,P) < epsilon.

So Let P = {0 = t0 < t1 < ... < tn = 1}
Since its bounded on [0,1] (|f(x)| <= S) and continuous on (0,1) we know its continuous on [t1,tn-1]. So Let P1 = { t1, ..., tn-1} So its continuous on this interval and bounded we know that it is uniformly continuous and thus integrable on this interval so we know that U(f,P1) - L(f,P1) < epsilon for all epsilon. Now I guess I need to add in the sums of the two intervals on the end to make the partition equal to P. Am I on the right track? SO then I would have U(f,P) - L(f,P) = M(f,[t0,t1])*(t1-t0) + U(f,P1) + M(f,[tn-1,tn])*(tn-tn-1) - [ m(f,[t0,t1]*(t1-t0) + L(f,P1) + m(f,[tn-1,tn]*(tn - tn-1) ] <= S(t1-t0) + U(f,P1) + S(tn-tn-1) - [S(t1-t0) + L(f,P1) + S(tn-tn-1)] = U(f,P1) - L(f,P1) < epsilon.

I think this is true but also feel like I am missing something. Any help is much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mathster said:
So its continuous on this interval and bounded we know that it is uniformly continuous and thus integrable on this interval so we know that U(f,P1) - L(f,P1) < epsilon for all epsilon.

This is false. Carefully, write the sentence again using the right quantifiers.
---

Here is a hint. Suppose $f$ and $g$ are functions defined on $[0,1]$ where $f$ is integrable on $[0,1]$ and $g=f$ for every $x\in [0,1]$ except for finitely many values. Then $g$ is integrable also on this interval.

If $f:[0,1]\to \mathbb{R}$ is bounded consider $\lim_{x\to 0^+}f(x)$. This limit may not necessarily exist, so instead consider $\limsup_{x\to 0^+}f(x)$ which does exist and is equal to some finite number number $a$. In a similar manner let $b = \limsup_{x\to 1^-}f(x)$. Now define function $g = a$ at $x=0$, $g=b$ at $x=1$, and $g=f$ for $0<x<1$. By the above theorem to show that $f$ is integrable on $[0,1]$ it sufficies to show that $g$ is integrable.

Since $\limsup_{x\to 0+} g(x) = g(0) $ for any $\varepsilon > 0$ there is a $0<A < 1$ such that $|g(A) - g(0)| < \varepsilon$. Since $\limsup_{x\to 1^-} g(x) = g(1)$ there is a $A<B<1$ such that $|g(B) - g(1)| < \varepsilon$.

Now on the interval $[A,B]$ the function $g$ is uniformly continuous so we can partition it as $\{ t_1,t_2,...,t_{n-1} \}$ such that $t_1=A,t_{n-1}=B$ and $|g(t_j) - g(t_{j-1})| < \varepsilon$.

Define $P = \{ t_0,t_1,t_2,...,t_{n-1},t_n\}$ such that $t_0=0$ and $t_n = 1$. Then we see that $|g(t_j) - g(t_{j-1}) | < \varepsilon$. From here you should be able to carry out the rest of the argument.
 
Just take $$P=\{0,1/n,...,i/n,...,1\}$$, $$i=0,2,...,n$$.

Hence, $$f(x)$$ is uniformly continuous on $$[1/n, (n-1)/n]$$. Hence, $$M_i-m_i<\eta$$, for $$1\leq i\leq n-1$$ and large $$n$$.

Let $$M=\sup |f(x)|$$, we get $$M_i-m_i\leq 2M$$.

Therefore

$$U(P,f)-L(P,f)\\=\sum_{1\leq i\leq n-1}(M_i-m_i)/n+(M_0-m_0)/n+(M_n-m_n)/n\leq\eta(n-2)/n+4M/n <\epsilon$$

for large n.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
558
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K