MHB Prove Ring with Identity on Set S with One Element x

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephen88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Ring
Stephen88
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
On a set S with exactly one element x,
define x + x = x, x*x = x. Prove that S is a ring.
The way I think about this problem is be showing that it verifies certain axioms...like associativity,commutativity,identity,inverse for addition and commutativity for multiplication and a (b + c) = ab + ac .. (a + b) c = ac + bc.
For Addition the first two i think it is obvious since
1.x+x=x+x..
2.(x+x)+x=x+(x+x)
For Identity since x+x=x then 0_S=x.
For the inverse I don't see how since the set has only one element x which equal 0_S...I guess I don't have to check the last two axioms because S is not a ring.
Am I doing this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We have x + (-x) = 0 where both -x and 0 are defined to be x, so there is no problem with an additive inverse.
 
uh sorry...yes that is true then for multiplication commutativity (x*x)*=x*(x*x) and also x(x+x)=x +x and (x+x)x=x+x again.Will this suffice or is there something else.?..because it seemed quite short.
 
StefanM said:
for multiplication commutativity (x*x)*=x*(x*x)
The fact (x * x) * x = x * (x * x) is called associativity.

StefanM said:
x(x+x)=x +x and (x+x)x=x+x again.
Distributivity says x(x+x) = x * x + x * x and (x+x) * x = x * x + x * x.

StefanM said:
Will this suffice or is there something else.?..because it seemed quite short.
Why don't you check the list of ring axioms, for example, in Wikipedia?
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top