Prove Tensor Analysis Relation: Γᵢₖᵣ = ∊ᵢ • ∂∊ⱼ/∂qᵏ

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Arham
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 4K views
Arham
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hello. I'm learning tensor analysis. I have a problem. We know that

[tex]\Gamma^i_{jk}=\vec{\epsilon^i}\cdot\frac{\partial\vec{\epsilon_j}}{\partial q^k}[/tex]

Please prove the relation

[tex]\frac{\partial\vec{\epsilon_j}}{\partial q^k}=\Gamma^m_{jk}\vec{\epsilon_m}[/tex]

Thanks very much in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What'll you pay me?
 
Arham said:
Hello. I'm learning tensor analysis. I have a problem. We know that

[tex]\Gamma^i_{jk}=\vec{\epsilon^i}\cdot\frac{\partial\vec{\epsilon_j}}{\partial q^k}[/tex]

Please prove the relation

[tex]\frac{\partial\vec{\epsilon_j}}{\partial q^k}=\Gamma^m_{jk}\vec{\epsilon_m}[/tex]

Thanks very much in advance
[tex]\Gamma^m_{jk}\vec{\epsilon_m}\cdot\vec{\epsilon^i}<br /> =\Gamma^m_{jk}\delta^i{}_m=\Gamma^i_{jk}[/tex]
 
Thanks hanskuo.

I knew this proof, but I thought that it is only correct for the inverse relation. I was wrong!
 
you are wellcome, Arham

Now I'm learning Differential Geometry,too.
do you begin to lerane covariant derivatives or not ?
 
I'm an undergraduate physics student, hanskuo. I am learning tensor analysis from George Arfken's book. As you know, this book has a brief introduction to Covariant Derivative; I have read it. But I should do more exercises and read more about it in future.
 
There are a lot of things interesting for covariant derivatives.
your original question likes this:
[tex] \nabla_{e_i}e_j=\Gamma^k{}_{ij}e_k[/tex]