- #1
zenterix
- 774
- 84
- Homework Statement
- Suppose we have an autonomous first order ordinary differential equation ##\dot{y}=f(y)##.
How do we prove that solutions can't have local maxima or minima?
- Relevant Equations
- This is the type of question that I can guess the answer to with arguments that seem simple at first but then seem hard to actually construct in full.
I am interested in different proofs that the answer is no.
Here is one argument.
Suppose we have a solution ##y## such that ##y(t_0)=y_0## and ##y'(t_0)=f(y_0)=0##.
##y(t)=y_0## is a solution since ##\dot{y}(t)=0## and so ##\dot{y}=f(y)=f(y_0)=0##.
I am aware of uniqueness theorems for linear differential equations. I don't remember seeing such a theorem for non-linear equations. Is there one?
If there is a unique solution such that ##y(t_0)=y_0## then this solution is the constant function ##y(t)=y_0##.
Thus, if this is the case, we cannot have local maxima in solutions to ##\dot{y}=f(y)## since at the maximum the function would coincide with another solution, namely the constant solution with the value of ##y## at the critical point.
Here is an attempt at another argument.
For autonomous differential equations, all solutions are horizontal shifts of any other solution.
If we have another function ##z(t)=y(t-\Delta t)## then ##\dot{z}=\dot{y}(t-\Delta t)=f(y(t-\Delta t))=f(z(t))##.
Thus, ##z## is also a solution.
If a solution is continuous and a local maximum occurs at ##t_0##, then there are points ##t_1## and ##t_2## such that ##t_1<t_0<t_2## and ##f(t_1)=f(t_2)<f(t_0)##.
If we shift the solution ##y(t)## by ##t_2-t_1## then what we end up with is a new solution that at ##t_1## has the same value as the original solution but a different slope.
Again, this would be precluded by a uniqueness theorem.
Finally, I just want to confirm: under no circumstances can we have solutions that have an inflection point (all for the same ##y_0## but different ##t##) where the slope is zero.
Ie, solutions that look like, say, ##(t-t_0)^3## for different ##t_0##. Now, clearly this specific function doesn't work, since it doesn't satisfy an autonomous DE. But I just cite it here to demonstrate the general shape of the solutions I am referring to.
Suppose we have a solution ##y## such that ##y(t_0)=y_0## and ##y'(t_0)=f(y_0)=0##.
##y(t)=y_0## is a solution since ##\dot{y}(t)=0## and so ##\dot{y}=f(y)=f(y_0)=0##.
I am aware of uniqueness theorems for linear differential equations. I don't remember seeing such a theorem for non-linear equations. Is there one?
If there is a unique solution such that ##y(t_0)=y_0## then this solution is the constant function ##y(t)=y_0##.
Thus, if this is the case, we cannot have local maxima in solutions to ##\dot{y}=f(y)## since at the maximum the function would coincide with another solution, namely the constant solution with the value of ##y## at the critical point.
Here is an attempt at another argument.
For autonomous differential equations, all solutions are horizontal shifts of any other solution.
If we have another function ##z(t)=y(t-\Delta t)## then ##\dot{z}=\dot{y}(t-\Delta t)=f(y(t-\Delta t))=f(z(t))##.
Thus, ##z## is also a solution.
If a solution is continuous and a local maximum occurs at ##t_0##, then there are points ##t_1## and ##t_2## such that ##t_1<t_0<t_2## and ##f(t_1)=f(t_2)<f(t_0)##.
If we shift the solution ##y(t)## by ##t_2-t_1## then what we end up with is a new solution that at ##t_1## has the same value as the original solution but a different slope.
Again, this would be precluded by a uniqueness theorem.
Finally, I just want to confirm: under no circumstances can we have solutions that have an inflection point (all for the same ##y_0## but different ##t##) where the slope is zero.
Ie, solutions that look like, say, ##(t-t_0)^3## for different ##t_0##. Now, clearly this specific function doesn't work, since it doesn't satisfy an autonomous DE. But I just cite it here to demonstrate the general shape of the solutions I am referring to.
Last edited:
