Prove the 2nd axiom of mathematical logic using the Deduction Theorem

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the second axiom of mathematical logic, which states that if P implies (Q implies R), then if P implies Q, it follows that P implies R. Participants emphasize the importance of using the Deduction Theorem for this proof. There's a consensus that axioms are foundational and should precede theorems in logical reasoning. Some users express skepticism about attempting the proof in reverse, suggesting that progress should be shared for constructive feedback. The conversation highlights the structured approach necessary for logical proofs in mathematical contexts.
solakis1
Messages
407
Reaction score
0
prove:
The 2nd axiom of mathematical logic

2) $((P\implies(Q\implies R))\implies((P\implies Q)\implies(P\implies R))$

By using only the deduction theorem
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Axioms come before theorems so there isn't much point, but if you still want to do this backwards then show us what progress you have made.
 

Similar threads

Use mathematical logic to prove this proposition
Replies
1
Views
1K
B Is everything in math either an axiom or a theorem?
2
Replies
72
Views
7K
B Questions about mathematics as a deductive system
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Deductive proof in logic formal systems
Replies
4
Views
325
B Are Implication and Equivalence Interchangeable in Logic?
Replies
9
Views
2K
I On the meaning of logical implication within specific context/models
Replies
22
Views
3K
Proof of mathematical theorems
Replies
8
Views
2K
The Current State of Mathematical Rigour
Replies
6
Views
2K
B Before understanding theorems in elementary Euclidean plane geometry
Replies
12
Views
2K
I Modus Ponens deduction rule
Replies
12
Views
2K