Prove the chain rule for Jacobi determinants

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the chain rule for Jacobi determinants, specifically the equation \(\frac{d(f,g)}{d(u,v)} * \frac{d(u,v)}{d(x,y)}=\frac{d(f,g)}{d(x,y)}\). The key error identified is the misinterpretation of the Jacobian matrix as containing total derivatives instead of partial derivatives. The correct approach involves using partial derivatives and applying the chain rule appropriately to derive the necessary relationships between the variables.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Jacobi determinants and their definitions
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives and multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of matrix operations, particularly determinants
  • Ability to apply the chain rule in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Jacobi determinants in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about the application of partial derivatives in the context of chain rules
  • Review matrix multiplication and determinant properties
  • Explore examples of applying the chain rule to multivariable functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on multivariable calculus, as well as researchers needing to apply Jacobi determinants in their work.

vst98
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove the chain rule for Jacobi determinants

\frac{d(f,g)}{d(u,v)} * \frac{d(u,v)}{d(x,y)}=\frac{d(f,g)}{d(x,y)}

Homework Equations



Definition of Jacobi determinant

\frac{d(f,g)}{d(u,v)} = \frac{d(f,g)}{d(u,v)} = det \begin{bmatrix}<br /> \frac{df}{du}&amp;\frac{df}{dv} \\ <br /> \frac{dg}{du}&amp;\frac{dg}{dv}<br /> \end{bmatrix}

The determinant of a matrix product of square matrices equals the product of their determinants:
det(AB)=det(A)det(B)

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac{d(f,g)}{d(u,v)} * \frac{d(u,v)}{d(x,y)} = det \begin{bmatrix}<br /> \frac{df}{du}&amp;\frac{df}{dv} \\ <br /> \frac{dg}{du}&amp;\frac{dg}{dv}<br /> \end{bmatrix} * <br /> det \begin{bmatrix}<br /> \frac{du}{dx}&amp;\frac{du}{dy} \\ <br /> \frac{dv}{dx}&amp;\frac{dv}{dy}<br /> \end{bmatrix} = det (\begin{bmatrix}<br /> \frac{df}{du}&amp;\frac{df}{dv} \\ <br /> \frac{dg}{du}&amp;\frac{dg}{dv}<br /> \end{bmatrix} * <br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> \frac{du}{dx}&amp;\frac{du}{dy} \\ <br /> \frac{dv}{dx}&amp;\frac{dv}{dy}<br /> \end{bmatrix}) = det\begin{bmatrix}<br /> \frac{df}{du}\frac{du}{dx} + \frac{df}{dv}\frac{dv}{dx}&amp;\frac{df}{du}\frac{du}{dy} + \frac{df}{dv}\frac{dv}{dy} \\ <br /> \frac{dg}{du}\frac{du}{dx} + \frac{dg}{dv}\frac{dv}{dx} &amp; \frac{dg}{du}\frac{du}{dy} + \frac{dg}{dv}\frac{dv}{dy}<br /> \end{bmatrix} = det \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 2\frac{df}{dx} &amp; 2\frac{df}{dy} \\ <br /> 2\frac{dg}{dx}&amp;2\frac{dg}{dy} <br /> \end{bmatrix} = 2*\frac{d(f,g)}{d(x,y)}

which is obviously wrong but I don't see where is my error.
Is it wrong to cancel out those cross terms after multiplying matrices, but what else can I do ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Proof

I know this is an old thread (and I hope you are not still stuck:-p), but I am just replying so other can use it for future reference.

The problem lies in the fact that you see the jacobian matrix as a matrix containing derivatives. As it is related to a multivariate function (a function depending on multiple variables), you should work with partial derivatives. As f is a function of u and v you can write

df=\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial u}\right)_{v}du+\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial v}\right)_{u}dv

where the subscript \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial u}\right)_{x} means the partial derivative of f with respect to u holding x constant.

As u and v are a function of x and y you can write:
du=\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\right)_{y}dx+\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right)_{x}dy
dv=\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right)_{y}dx+\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}\right)_{x}dy

If we will in these equations in the previous, we can obtain:
df=\left[\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial v}\right)_{u}\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right)_{y}+\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial u}\right)_{v}\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\right)_{y}\right]dx+\left[\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial u}\right)_{v}\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right)_{x}+\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial v}\right)_{u}\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}\right)_{x}\right]dy
As f is also a function of x and y we can also write:
df=\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\right)_{y}dx+\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right)_{x}dy

From the last two equations, we can solve:
\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\right)_{y}=\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial v}\right)_{u}\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right)_{y}+\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial u}\right)_{v}\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\right)_{y}
\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right)_{x}=\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial u}\right)_{v}\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right)_{x}+\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial v}\right)_{u}\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}\right)_{x}

You can see that this resembles the upper row of your second to last result. If you rework your proof using these rules, it should find the proof you need.

Good luck!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
28K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K