MHB Prove the following; (vector spaces and linear operators)

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the vector space V can be expressed as a direct sum of subspaces U_1 and U_-1, where U_λ consists of vectors v in V such that T(v) = λv, given that T^2 = I. It is established that the only eigenvalues of T are 1 and -1, leading to the conclusion that V = U_1 ⊕ U_-1. The proof demonstrates that specific constructions of vectors u and w from a vector v show that u belongs to U_1 and w belongs to U_-1. Further, it is noted that V can be represented as a direct sum, inviting others to prove the directness of this sum. The discussion emphasizes the properties of linear operators and their eigenvalues in vector spaces.
toni07
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
a) V = U_1 ⊕ U_-1 where U_λ = {v in V | T(v) = λv}
b) if V = M_nn(R) and T(A) = A^t then what are U_1 and U_-1

When V is a vector space over R, and T : V -> V is a linear operator for which
T^2 = IV .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Prove the following;

Given $T^2 = I$, it's clear the only possible eigenvalues are 1 and -1, since the minimal polynomial for $T$ divides $x^2 - 1 = (x + 1)(x - 1)$.

Note that:

$\frac{1}{2}(T + I) - \frac{1}{2}(T - I) = I$

Thus:

$v = Iv = \frac{1}{2}(T + I)(v) - \frac{1}{2}(T - I)(v)$

I claim $u = \frac{1}{2}(T + I)(v) \in U_1$ and

$w = -\frac{1}{2}(T - I)(v) \in U_{-1}$.

To see this, observe that:

$T(u) = T(\frac{1}{2}(T + I)(v)) = \frac{1}{2}T(T + I)(v) = \frac{1}{2}(T^2 + T)(v)$

$= \frac{1}{2}(T + I)(v) = u$, while:

$T(w) = T(-\frac{1}{2}(T - I)(v)) = -\frac{1}{2}T(T - I)(v) = -\frac{1}{2}(T^2 - T)(v)$

$= \frac{1}{2}(T - I)(v) = -w$.

Thus $V = U_1 + U_{-1}$.

Your turn (prove this sum is direct).
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K