Prove the given complex number problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on proving the relationship between a complex number \( z = a + bi \) and its conjugate \( z^* = a - bi \). The participants confirm that the product \( zz^* = a^2 + b^2 \) accurately represents the sum of the squares of the real and imaginary parts, expressed as \( \bigl(\Re(z)\bigr)^2 + \bigl(\Im(z)\bigr)^2 \). Alternative representations using LaTeX formatting are also discussed, highlighting the aesthetic aspects of mathematical notation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of exploring different perspectives on mathematical problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with LaTeX for mathematical typesetting
  • Knowledge of real and imaginary parts of complex numbers
  • Basic grasp of mathematical proofs and relationships
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced properties of complex numbers, such as polar representation
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of complex multiplication
  • Study LaTeX formatting techniques for mathematical expressions
  • Investigate alternative methods for proving properties of complex numbers
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying complex analysis, educators teaching mathematical notation, and anyone interested in enhancing their understanding of complex number properties and LaTeX formatting.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,828
Reaction score
420
Homework Statement
Prove that, for any complex number ##z##, ##zz^{*}= \bigl(\Re (z))^2+\bigl(\Im (z))^2##
Relevant Equations
Complex numbers
This is pretty straightforward,
Let ##z=a+bi##
## \bigl(\Re (z))=a, \bigl(\Im (z))=b##
##zz^*=(a+bi)(a-bi)=a^2+b^2 =\bigl(\Re (z))^2+\bigl(\Im (z))^2##
Any other approach? this are pretty simple questions ...all the same its good to explore different perspective on the same...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
https://www.math-linux.com/latex-26/faq/latex-faq/article/latex-real-part-symbol

$$zz^{*}= \bigl(\Re(z)\bigr )^2+ \bigl(\Im (z)\bigr )^2\qquad {\sf {or}}
\qquad \bigl (\operatorname{Re}(z)\bigr )^2+ \bigl(\operatorname{Im} (z)\bigr )^2$$but I have no trouble admitting both are ugly. Fortunately this doesn't occur all that often. Maybe \Bigr etc is a little better: $$zz^{*}= \Bigl(\Re(z)\Bigr)^2+ \Bigl(\Im (z)\Bigr )^2\qquad {\sf {or}}
\qquad \Bigl (\operatorname{Re}(z)\Bigr )^2+ \Bigl(\operatorname{Im} (z)\Bigr )^2$$

##\ ##
 
Last edited:
Thanks Bvu, i have greatly learned latex from you...will take note...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
chwala said:
Any other approach?
$${\sf z} = |{\sf z}| e^ {i\arg {\sf z} }, \quad {\sf z^*} = |{\sf z}| e^ {-i\arg {\sf z} } \Rightarrow {\sf zz^*} = |{\sf z}|^2 $$but: does that pass muster ?
I guess not :cry: ...

##\ ##
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: chwala

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K