Prove this variation: If a+b ∝ a-b, prove that a^2+b^2 ∝ ab

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the expressions ##a+b## and ##a-b##, specifically exploring the implication that if ##a+b \varpropto a-b##, then it must follow that ##a^2+b^2 \varpropto ab##. Participants are examining the validity of this assertion and the necessary conditions for it to hold true.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to manipulate the initial proportionality condition algebraically to derive the second proportionality. Others question the completeness of the problem statement and whether the constants involved are indeed the same. Counterexamples are provided to challenge the assertion, leading to discussions about the nature of proportionality.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants express skepticism about the original claim, while others propose algebraic approaches to validate or refute it. There is no explicit consensus, but several lines of reasoning are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may lack clarity regarding the nature of the variables involved and whether they are intended to be integers or real numbers. This ambiguity influences the interpretations and approaches taken in the discussion.

RChristenk
Messages
73
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
If ##a+b \varpropto a-b ##, prove that ##a^2+b^2 \varpropto ab##
Relevant Equations
Basic fractions and algebra
##a+b \varpropto a-b## means ##a+b = k_1(a-b)##

##(a+b)^2=k_1^2(a-b)^2##

##a^2+b^2+2ab=a^2k_1^2+b^2k_1^2-2abk_1^2##

##2ab(1+k_1^2)=a^2(k_1^2-1)+b^2(k_1^2-1)##

##2ab(k_1^2+1)=(a^2+b^2)(k_1^2-1)##

##a^2+b^2=ab(\dfrac{2k_1^2+2}{k_1^2-1})##

Since ##a^2+b^2 \varpropto ab## means ##a^2+b^2=abk_2##, compared to what I got, I can say ##k_2 = \dfrac{2k_1^2+2}{k_1^2-1}##. Therefore ##a^2+b^2 \varpropto ab## has been proven. Is this a correct? Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
##a = 3, b = 1 \ \Rightarrow \ (a+b) = 2(a -b)##

##a^2 + b^2 = 10, \ ab = 3##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR and FactChecker
Have you stated the problem exactly and completely? Maybe I'm missing something but it seems false to me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
FactChecker said:
Have you stated the problem exactly and completely? Maybe I'm missing something but it seems false to me.
It's definitely false, given I provided a counterexample!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR and FactChecker
RChristenk said:
Homework Statement: If ##a+b \varpropto a-b ##, prove that ##a^2+b^2 \varpropto ab##
Relevant Equations: Basic fractions and algebra

##a+b \varpropto a-b## means ##a+b = k_1(a-b)##
What seems to be missing in the problem statement here is the idea that ##a^2 + b^2## must be shown to be in the same proportion to ab as a + b is to a - b.

IOW, if a + b = k(a - b), then ##a^2 + b^2 = kab##.
 
Mark44 said:
What seems to be missing in the problem statement here is the idea that ##a^2 + b^2## must be shown to be in the same proportion to ab as a + b is to a - b.

IOW, if a + b = k(a - b), then ##a^2 + b^2 = kab##.
That doesn't seem possible.
 
PeroK said:
That doesn't seem possible.
I agree. My comment was about I believe what the intent of the problem was, taking into account your counterexample. As a very simple example of what I am talking about, show that if ##x \varpropto y## then ##2x \varpropto 2y##. In the two resulting equations, the same constant applies to both.

What the OP is doing is something like this:
Show that ##x \varpropto y \Rightarrow x^2 \varpropto y^2##.
##x \varpropto y \Rightarrow x = ky## for some nonzero k
##x = ky \Rightarrow x^2 = k^2y^2 \Rightarrow x^2 = K y^2 \Rightarrow x^2 \varpropto y^2##

But if x = 4 and y = 2, then x = 2y, but ##x^2 = 16 \ne 8 = 2y^2##.
x and y aren't in the same proportion as ##x^2## and ##y^2##.
 
The question just states if ##a+b \varpropto a-b##, prove that ##a^2+b^2 \varpropto ab##.

I think the constants are different. So ## a+b = k_1(a-b)## and ##a^2+b^2 = k_2ab##.

##\Rightarrow (a+b)^2=k_1^2(a-b)^2##

##\Rightarrow a^2+2ab+b^2=a^2k_1^2-2abk_1^2+b^2k_1^2##

Now using ##a^2+b^2 = k_2ab## and replacing the left side of the above equation, get:

##\Rightarrow k_2ab+2ab=a^2k_1^2-2abk_1^2+b^2k_1^2##

##\Rightarrow k_2ab+2ab+2abk_1^2=(a^2+b^2)k_1^2##

##\Rightarrow ab(k_2+2+2k_1^2)=(a^2+b^2)k_1^2##

##\Rightarrow a^2+b^2 = ab\dfrac{(2k_1^2+k_2+2)}{k_1^2}##

So since ##\dfrac{(2k_1^2+k_2+2)}{k_1^2}## is a new constant of variation, ##a^2+b^2 \varpropto ab## is proven. That's just what I'm thinking.
 
RChristenk said:
The question just states if ##a+b \varpropto a-b##, prove that ##a^2+b^2 \varpropto ab##.

I think the constants are different. So ## a+b = k_1(a-b)## and ##a^2+b^2 = k_2ab##.

##\Rightarrow (a+b)^2=k_1^2(a-b)^2##

##\Rightarrow a^2+2ab+b^2=a^2k_1^2-2abk_1^2+b^2k_1^2##

Now using ##a^2+b^2 = k_2ab## and replacing the left side of the above equation, get:

##\Rightarrow k_2ab+2ab=a^2k_1^2-2abk_1^2+b^2k_1^2##

##\Rightarrow k_2ab+2ab+2abk_1^2=(a^2+b^2)k_1^2##

##\Rightarrow ab(k_2+2+2k_1^2)=(a^2+b^2)k_1^2##

##\Rightarrow a^2+b^2 = ab\dfrac{(2k_1^2+k_2+2)}{k_1^2}##

So since ##\dfrac{(2k_1^2+k_2+2)}{k_1^2}## is a new constant of variation, ##a^2+b^2 \varpropto ab## is proven. That's just what I'm thinking.
But this definition of "proportionality" is tautological. Any two quantities ##x## and ##y## are "proportional" (##y=kx##) if one is free to set ##k=y/x##. A proper proportionality requires that ##k## be independent of ##x,y##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker and Mark44
  • #10
RChristenk said:
The question just states if ##a+b \varpropto a-b##, prove that ##a^2+b^2 \varpropto ab##.

I think the constants are different. So ## a+b = k_1(a-b)## and ##a^2+b^2 = k_2ab##.

##\Rightarrow (a+b)^2=k_1^2(a-b)^2##

##\Rightarrow a^2+2ab+b^2=a^2k_1^2-2abk_1^2+b^2k_1^2##

Now using ##a^2+b^2 = k_2ab## and replacing the left side of the above equation, get:

##\Rightarrow k_2ab+2ab=a^2k_1^2-2abk_1^2+b^2k_1^2##

##\Rightarrow k_2ab+2ab+2abk_1^2=(a^2+b^2)k_1^2##

##\Rightarrow ab(k_2+2+2k_1^2)=(a^2+b^2)k_1^2##

##\Rightarrow a^2+b^2 = ab\dfrac{(2k_1^2+k_2+2)}{k_1^2}##

So since ##\dfrac{(2k_1^2+k_2+2)}{k_1^2}## is a new constant of variation, ##a^2+b^2 \varpropto ab## is proven. That's just what I'm thinking.
Apart from when zero is involved, all real numbers are proportional to each other. This question only makes sense if the numbers involved are integers. In this case, if ##a, b \ne zero##, then:
$$a^a + b^2 = (\frac{a^2 + b^2}{ab})ab$$And there is no need to do any calculations. And nothing to prove.

Moreover, ##a + b = k(a - b)## is true for all real numbers ##a, b##. So, there is no "if" involved. It's only when ##a, b## and ##k## are integers that this condition makes sense.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
  • #11
RChristenk said:
Homework Statement: If ##a+b \varpropto a-b ##, prove that ##a^2+b^2 \varpropto ab##
Perhaps ##a## and ##b## are supposed to be variables or parameters? Then ##a+b \varpropto a-b ## implies ##a \varpropto b ## and the result is trivial.

I originally assumed it was an integer equation. The question needs some context.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
  • #12
PeroK said:
Perhaps ##a## and ##b## are supposed to be variables or parameters? Then ##a+b \varpropto a-b ## implies ##a \varpropto b ## and the result is trivial.
IMO, this is the answer that the problem had in mind.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
13K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K