MHB Prove Triangle Inequality: $\sum_{cyc} \sin A$

lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Prove, that for any triangle:\[ \sum_{cyc}\sin A - \prod_{cyc}\sin A \ge \sum_{cyc}\sin^3 A \]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I am so sorry, that I have posted a challenge, the solution of which, I am not certain. My problem is the use of the Rearrangement Inequality in the proof. I have asked in the forum: ”Pre-University Math/trigonometry” (http://mathhelpboards.com/trigonometry-12/usage-rearrangement-inequality-trigonometric-expression-20998.html#post95174), and I am aware, that it is bad policy to post a challenge in one forum and ask for a partial solution of it in another on the MHB site. Again, I am very sorry about this. It won´t happen again.

Here is the suggested solution:
Division by $\sin A \sin B \sin C$:

\[\sum_{cyc}\frac{1}{\sin B \sin C}-1 \geq \sum_{cyc}\frac{\sin^2 A}{\sin B \sin C}=\sum_{cyc}\frac{1- \cos^2 A}{\sin B \sin C} \\\\ \Rightarrow \sum_{cyc}\frac{\cos^2 A}{\sin B \sin C} \geq 1\]

Now, here comes the moment, where the Rearrangement Inequality is applied:

\[\sum_{cyc} \frac{\cos^2A}{\sin B\sin C}\geq \sum_{cyc} \frac{\cos B \cos C}{\sin B\sin C} =\sum_{cyc}\cot B \cot C = 1.\]
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top