Proving a statement about covered intervals

  • Thread starter Thread starter littlemathquark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interval problem
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving a statement related to covered intervals involving the fraction \(\frac{p}{q}\) and the constant \(\alpha = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\). The claim asserts that if \(0 < \frac{p}{q} < \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\), then \(\frac{p}{q} + \frac{1}{4q^2} < \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\), and if \(1 > \frac{p}{q} > \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\), then \(\frac{p}{q} - \frac{1}{4q^2} > \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\). The proof utilizes the Dirichlet approximation theorem and the Mean Value Theorem, focusing on the behavior of the function \(f(x) = 2x^2 - 1\) near \(\alpha\). A crucial step involves establishing a lower bound for the distance between \(\frac{m}{n}\) and \(\alpha\), leading to the conclusion that \(\left\lvert \frac{m}{n} - \alpha \right\rvert > \frac{1}{4n^2}\). This approach is an adaptation of Liouville's theorem, emphasizing the importance of finding an appropriate interval around \(\alpha\).
littlemathquark
Messages
204
Reaction score
26
New user has been reminded to always show their work on schoolwork problems.
Homework Statement
The rational number p/q in the inerval (0,1) covered by the closed interval [p/q-1/4q^2, p/q+1/4q^2]. How do I prove that none of these intervals cover the number (sqrt{2}) /2?
Relevant Equations
The rational number p/q in the inerval (0,1) covered by the closed interval [p/q-1/4q^2, p/q+1/4q^2]. How do I prove that none of these intervals cover the number (sqrt{2}) /2?
I need any idea. I haven't made any progress in solving the problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The idea is that if ##0 < \frac p q < \frac {\sqrt 2}{2}##, then ##\frac p q + \frac 1 {4q^2} < \frac {\sqrt 2}{2}##. And, if ##1 > \frac p q > \frac {\sqrt 2}{2}##, then ##\frac p q - \frac 1 {4q^2} > \frac {\sqrt 2}{2}##.

Can you show that?
 
I used Dirichlet approximation theorem but I can't find any progression.
 
Looks tricky.
 
  1. ##\alpha := \sqrt{2}/2 ## is a root of ##f(x) = 2x^2-1##.
  2. For ## x\in (\alpha - 1/5, \alpha +1/5) ## we have ##(\frac{1}{2} <) f'(x) < \frac{40}{11} =: C < 4 ##.
  3. Conclude by Lagrange MVT that
    <br /> |x-\alpha| &lt; \frac{1}{5} \Rightarrow |f(x)-f(\alpha)| = |2x^2-1| &lt; C|x-\alpha|<br />
Claim. We have
<br /> \left\lvert \frac{m}{n}-\alpha \right\rvert &gt; \frac{1}{4n^2}<br />
for all ##m,n\in\mathbb N##. Then it follows that either
<br /> \alpha &gt; \frac{m}{n} + \frac{1}{4n^2}\quad\mbox{or}\quad \frac{m}{n}-\frac{1}{4n^2}&gt; \alpha.<br />

Proof of claim. The nontrivial case is ##|m/n - \alpha| < 1/5##. Then
<br /> \left\lvert f\left(\frac{m}{n}\right)\right\rvert = \left\lvert 2\frac{m^2}{n^2}-1 \right\rvert &lt; C\left\lvert \frac{m}{n}-\alpha \right\rvert \Rightarrow n^2\left\lvert 2\frac{m^2}{n^2}-1 \right\rvert &lt; Cn^2\left\lvert \frac{m}{n}-\alpha \right\rvert.<br />
Because ##f## has no rational roots, we conclude ## n^2\left\lvert 2\frac{m^2}{n^2}-1 \right\rvert \geqslant 1 ## and therefore
<br /> Cn^2\left\lvert \frac{m}{n}-\alpha \right\rvert &gt; 1 \Rightarrow \left\lvert \frac{m}{n}-\alpha \right\rvert &gt; \frac{1}{Cn^2} &gt; \frac{1}{4n^2}.<br />

This is an adaptation of a proof of Liouville's theorem. The trick is finding a small enough interval around ##\alpha## such that you get a suitable upper bound for the derivative.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K