MHB Proving Angles in Triangle ABC < 120° & Cos + Sin > -√3/3

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Triangle
Click For Summary
In triangle ABC, it is established that all angles are less than 120°. The goal is to prove that the ratio of the sum of the cosines to the sum of the sines of the angles exceeds -√3/3. The relationship between the angles and their trigonometric functions is crucial in demonstrating this inequality. The proof involves applying trigonometric identities and properties of triangles. Ultimately, the conclusion affirms the inequality holds true under the given conditions.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
All the angles in triangle $ABC$ are less than $120^{\circ}$. Prove that

$\dfrac{\cos A+\cos B+\cos C}{\sin A+\sin B+\sin C}>-\dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{3}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[TIKZ]
\coordinate[label=left:A] (A) at (0,0);
\coordinate[label=right:B] (B) at (6, 0);
\coordinate[label=above:C] (C) at (2.4,3);
\coordinate[label=above: $A_1$] ($A_1$) at (7,3);
\coordinate[label=below: $B_1$] ($B_1$) at (7.2,0);
\coordinate[label=below: $C_1$] ($C_1$) at (12,2);
\draw (A) -- (B)-- (C)-- (A);
\draw (7,3) -- (7.2,0)-- (12,2)-- (7,3);
[/TIKZ]
Consider the triangle $A_1B_1C_1$ where $\angle A_1=120^{\circ}-\angle A,\,\angle B_1=120^{\circ}-\angle B$ and $\angle C_1=120^{\circ}-\angle C$. The given condition guarantees the existence of such a triangle.

Applying the triangle inequality in triangle $A_1B_1C_1$ gives $B_1C_1+C_1A_1>A_1B_1$, i.e.

$\sin A_1+\sin B_1>\sin C_1$ by applying the law of sines to triangle $A_1B_1C_1$.

It follows that

$\sin (120^{\circ}-A)+\sin (120^{\circ}-B)>\sin (120^{\circ}-C)$ or

$\dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{2}(\cos A+\cos B+\cos C)+\dfrac{1}{2}(\sin A+\sin B+\sin C)>0$.

Taking into account that $a+b>c$ implies $\sin A+\sin B-\sin C>0$, the above inequality can be rewritten as

$\dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\cdot \dfrac{\cos A+\cos B+\cos C}{\sin A+\sin B+\sin C}+\dfrac{1}{2}>0$, from which the conclusion follows.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K