Proving B is Involutory if A is Idempotent

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter radou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that matrix B is involutory if matrix A is idempotent, given the relationship B = 2A - I. The proof involves demonstrating that if A is idempotent (A^2 = A), then B satisfies the condition B^2 = I, confirming its involutory nature. The participants emphasize the importance of squaring both sides of the equation B = 2A - I to establish both directions of the proof effectively. Ultimately, the proof is successfully completed by applying this method.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of square matrices and their properties
  • Knowledge of idempotent matrices and their characteristics
  • Familiarity with involutory matrices and the condition B^2 = I
  • Basic matrix multiplication techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of idempotent matrices in linear algebra
  • Learn about involutory matrices and their applications
  • Explore matrix operations and their implications in proofs
  • Investigate the implications of matrix transformations in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in matrix theory and its applications in proofs and transformations.

radou
Homework Helper
Messages
3,149
Reaction score
8
Let A and B be square matrices of order n, such that B = 2A - I. (1) One has to proove that B is involutory (B^2 = I) <=> A is idempotent (A^2 = A).

Starting off with direction <= , one multiplies (1) with A from the right and from the left, separately, and obtains the results BA = A, and AB = A, respectively. This implies B = I, and I is an involutory matrix, so that direction is prooved. (I hope, that's why I'm asking.)

The second direction, => , causes trouble and I'd appreciate any help. I tried multiplying (1) with B, but it didn't seem to help. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BA = A and AB = A does not give B = I. For example, take A=0 (there are other examples too). It is true that B=I if BA = A and AB = A holds for all A, but that isn't the case here.

Just square both sides of B=2A-I. This should give both directions pretty easily.
 
StatusX said:
BA = A and AB = A does not give B = I. For example, take A=0 (there are other examples too). It is true that B=I if BA = A and AB = A holds for all A, but that isn't the case here.

Just realized that, thanks.

StatusX said:
Just square both sides of B=2A-I. This should give both directions pretty easily.

Did that, and prooved both directions. Thanks again! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K