MHB Proving BC=AE+BE in $\triangle ABC$

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
In triangle ABC, where AB equals AC and angle A measures 100 degrees, the angle bisector of angle B intersects side AC at point E. The goal is to prove that the length of side BC is equal to the sum of segments AE and BE. The discussion emphasizes the properties of isosceles triangles and angle bisectors to establish the relationship between the sides and segments. Key geometric principles and theorems are applied to demonstrate this equality. The proof hinges on the congruence of triangles formed by the angle bisector and the properties of angles in isosceles triangles.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
$\triangle ABC,\, AB=AC ,\,\, \angle A=100^o$
the angle bisectoer of $\angle B $ intersects AC at point E
prove BC=AE+BE
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I could not draw the figure

but

in $\triangle$ ABE we have $\angle ABE = 20^o$

so $\frac{AE}{BE}= \frac{\sin \; 20^0}{\sin \; 100^0}$

similarly in

in $\triangle$ BCE we have $\angle BEC = 120^o$

so $\frac{BC}{BE}= \frac{\sin \; 120^0}{\sin \; 40^0}$

as we need to prove

BC = AE + BE

or $ \frac{BC}{BE} = 1 + \frac{AE}{BE}$

or $\frac{\sin \; 120^0}{\sin \; 40 ^0}= 1 + \frac{\sin \; 20^0}{\sin \; 100^0} $

we have RHS
= $1 + \frac{\sin \; 20^0}{\sin \; 100^0} $
= $ \frac{\sin \; 20^0+ \sin \; (100)^0} {\sin \; 100^0} $
= $ \frac{\sin \; 20^0+ \sin \; (100)^0} {\sin \; (180-100)^0} $
= $ \frac{\sin \; 20^0+ \sin \; (100)^0} {\sin \;80^0} $
= $ \frac{2 \sin \; 60^0 \cos \;40 ^0} {2 \cos \;40^0\sin \;40^0} $
=$ \frac{ \sin \; 60^0 } {sin \;40^0} $
= $ \frac{ \sin \;(180- 60)^0 } {sin \;40^0} $
= $ \frac{ \sin \;120^0 } {sin \;40^0} $
=LHS
 
Last edited:
from the diagram it is easy to see that :BC=AE+BE
View attachment 2536
 

Attachments

  • BC is the sum of AE and BE.JPG
    BC is the sum of AE and BE.JPG
    14.5 KB · Views: 96
Thread 'erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
983
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K