Proving Binomial Coefficients for Even n | Combinatorial Argument

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving two identities involving binomial coefficients for even n. The first identity states that the sum of binomial coefficients for even indices equals 2 raised to the power of (n-1), and a combinatorial argument is suggested using the relationship C(n, 2k) = C(n-1, 2k) + C(n-1, 2k-1). The second identity involves proving that the sum of the squares of binomial coefficients equals C(2n, n), with participants expressing confusion about the steps needed to derive this result. Clarifications are sought regarding the transitions between different forms of the binomial coefficients and the summation properties. The conversation emphasizes the importance of combinatorial arguments in proving these identities.
jbear12
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Suppose n is even, prove:
\sumk=0->n/2, C(n,2k)=2^(n-1)=\sumk=1->n/2, C(n,2k-1)
Give a combinatorial argument to prove that: (I've figured out this one...)
\sumk=1->n, C(n,k)^2=C(2n,n)

For the first problem, I tried to break C(n, 2k) into C(n+1,2k)-C(n, 2k-1), but they didnt seem to work very well. (I also noticed that \sum0, n C(n,2k)=2^n, but I can't really use this to solve the problem.)
For the second problem, I don't have a clue.
Any thoughts?
Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You want to prove that, for n even, \sum_{k= 0}^{n/2}C(n, 2k)= 2^{n-1} and that \sum_{k=0}^{n/2} C(n, 2k-1)= 2^{n-1}

You think mean you have tried to use C(n, 2k)= C(n-1,2k)-C(n-1, 2k-1) . That works nicely! If you take i= 2k, That just says C(n, i)= C(n-1, i)+ C(n-1, i) and your sum is \sum_{k= 0}^{n/2}C(n, 2k)= \sum_{i= 0}^n C(n-1, i)= 2^{n-1}!

For the second one, let i= 2k-1.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You want to prove that, for n even, \sum_{k= 0}^{n/2}C(n, 2k)= 2^{n-1} and that \sum_{k=0}^{n/2} C(n, 2k-1)= 2^{n-1}

You think mean you have tried to use C(n, 2k)= C(n-1,2k)-C(n-1, 2k-1) . That works nicely! If you take i= 2k, That just says C(n, i)= C(n-1, i)+ C(n-1, i) and your sum is \sum_{k= 0}^{n/2}C(n, 2k)= \sum_{i= 0}^n C(n-1, i)= 2^{n-1}!

For the second one, let i= 2k-1.
Thanks HallsofIvy.
But I don't get it how you get from C(n, 2k)= C(n-1,2k)-C(n-1, 2k-1) to C(n, i)= C(n-1, i)+ C(n-1, i). Taking i=2k, why is C(n-1,i-1) equal to -C(n-1,i).
Also, why is \sum_{i= 0}^n C(n-1, i)= 2* \sum_{i= 0}^{n/2} C(n-1, i)
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K