Proving Bloch's Theorem

  • Thread starter naele
  • Start date
202
1
One of the more common ways of showing that a Hamiltonian with periodic potential commutes with the translation operator is to write the following (like Ashcroft and Mermin p. 133)

[tex]
T(R)H(r)\psi(r)=H(r+R)\psi(r+R)=H(r)T(R)\psi(r)
[/tex]

I suspect this might be a dumb question, but what allows us to write [itex]T(R)H(r)\psi(r)=H(r+R)\psi(r+R)[/itex], that is why is the translation operator acting on both the Hamiltonian and the wave, and not just on the Hamiltonian?
 
2
0
I think its because the potential is periodic then the Hamiltonian is too: H(x)=H(x+a), you can then sub this in directly and the translation operator now just acts on psi
 

Hurkyl

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
14,845
17
I suspect this might be a dumb question, but what allows us to write [itex]T(R)H(r)\psi(r)=H(r+R)\psi(r+R)[/itex]
Because that is the definition of how the space translation operator acts on a ket.

It may help to write [itex]\theta(r) = H(r) \psi(r)[/itex]. [itex]\theta(r)[/itex] is a ket. What [itex]T(R) \theta(r)[/itex]....


It may help more to consider more traditional function notation for what I believe is being written:
[tex] (T(R) H \psi)(r) = (H \psi)(r + R).[/tex]
 

Related Threads for: Proving Bloch's Theorem

  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
543
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
676
  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
12K
Replies
87
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top