Proving Carnot efficiency is maximum and conditions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof that Carnot efficiency cannot be exceeded, emphasizing the coupling of a more efficient engine to a Carnot refrigerator, which would violate the second law of thermodynamics. Key points include the assertion that only a Carnot engine is reversible, making the argument specific to Carnot efficiency. Additionally, the two-isotherm, two-adiabatic Carnot cycle is highlighted as a conceptual tool for understanding reversible cycles. The conversation seeks to clarify misconceptions surrounding the application of this argument to arbitrary efficiencies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the second law of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with Carnot engines and their properties
  • Knowledge of reversible processes in thermodynamics
  • Concept of isothermal and adiabatic processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of the second law of thermodynamics in detail
  • Explore the characteristics and limitations of Carnot engines
  • Investigate reversible thermodynamic processes and their implications
  • Learn about isothermal and adiabatic processes in thermodynamic cycles
USEFUL FOR

Students of thermodynamics, engineers in mechanical and thermal fields, and anyone interested in the principles of efficiency in heat engines.

C_Pu
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
The standard proof to show carnot efficiency cannot be exceeded is to couple a supposedly more efficient engine to a carnot refrigerator, and show that it would violate second law. However, isn't it true that we can make the same argument with any arbitrary efficiency?

Some discussions on stackexchange regarding this topic say the key point is only carnot engine is reversible which makes this line of argument specific to carnot efficiency. They also suggested the two-isotherm two-adiabatic carnot cycle is only for easier conceptualization of a reversible cycle.

Can someone clarify all this confusion please?
 
Science news on Phys.org
C_Pu said:
However, isn't it true that we can make the same argument with any arbitrary efficiency?
Could you clarify what you mean by that? (And also what you mean by "Carnot efficiency.")
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
14K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K