Proving Convergent Sequence of x^t to 0

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The sequence defined by ##x^t = \frac{2t+5}{t^2+7}## converges to 0 as ##t## approaches infinity. This is demonstrated using the epsilon-delta definition of convergence, where for any ##\epsilon > 0##, there exists a natural number ##N## such that for all ##t > N##, the inequality ##\left|\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7}\right| < \epsilon## holds. By simplifying the expression, it is shown that ##\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7} \leq \frac{7}{t}## for sufficiently large ##t##, confirming convergence to 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits and convergence in sequences
  • Familiarity with epsilon-delta definitions of limits
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of inequalities
  • Knowledge of natural numbers and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in more depth
  • Explore convergence of sequences and series in calculus
  • Learn about the properties of rational functions and their limits
  • Investigate other convergence tests for sequences
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on sequences and limits, as well as educators looking for examples of convergence proofs.

squenshl
Messages
468
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Show, from the definition of what it means for a function to converge to a limit, that the sequence ##\left\{x^t\right\}_{t=1}^{\infty}## with ##x^t = \frac{2t+5}{t^2+7}## converges to ##0## as ##t## goes to infinity.

Homework Equations


A sequence converges to ##x^0 \in X## if for any ##\epsilon > 0##, there is ##N \in \mathbb{N}## such that if ##t > N##, then ##d(x^t,x^0) < \epsilon##.

The Attempt at a Solution


To show that ##x^t = \frac{2t+5}{t^2+7}## converges to ##0## we must, for any ##\epsilon > 0##, find a value ##N## such that if ##t > N##, then
$$\left|\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7} - 0\right| = \left|\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7}\right| < \epsilon$$.
Now sure how to simplify ##x^t## to show that it is less than or equal to some much simpler expression in ##t## that can clearly be made less than any given ##\epsilon## by choosing ##n## large enough. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, you could note that ##t^2 +7 > t^2##
 
Since t is positive so is the fraction so you can drop the absolute value sign: \frac{2t+ 5}{t^2+ 7}&lt; \epsilon so 2t+ 5&lt; \epsilon(t^2+ 7). For what t is \epsilon t^2- 2t+ 7\epsilon- 5&gt; 0?
 
squenshl said:

Homework Statement


Show, from the definition of what it means for a function to converge to a limit, that the sequence ##\left\{x^t\right\}_{t=1}^{\infty}## with ##x^t = \frac{2t+5}{t^2+7}## converges to ##0## as ##t## goes to infinity.

Homework Equations


A sequence converges to ##x^0 \in X## if for any ##\epsilon > 0##, there is ##N \in \mathbb{N}## such that if ##t > N##, then ##d(x^t,x^0) < \epsilon##.

The Attempt at a Solution


To show that ##x^t = \frac{2t+5}{t^2+7}## converges to ##0## we must, for any ##\epsilon > 0##, find a value ##N## such that if ##t > N##, then
$$\left|\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7} - 0\right| = \left|\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7}\right| < \epsilon$$.
Now sure how to simplify ##x^t## to show that it is less than or equal to some much simpler expression in ##t## that can clearly be made less than any given ##\epsilon## by choosing ##n## large enough. Please help.


If you do not want the smallest possible ##N## giving ##|x_t| < \epsilon## for ## t > N##, but are satisfied with some ##N = N(\epsilon)## that 'works', the problem is quite straightforward. Do you agree that for ##t \geq 1## the numerator is ##\leq 7t##? Do you agree that the denominator is ##> t^2##?
 
Yup that's obvious so is it as easy as saying ##\frac{2t}{t^2} = \frac{2}{t} < \epsilon##.
 
squenshl said:
Yup that's obvious so is it as easy as saying ##\frac{2t}{t^2} = \frac{2}{t} < \epsilon##.
Well, no: ##5 + 2 \neq 2##.
 
Then I'm a little stuck. That ##t^2## has lost me. It's easy if it's just ##t##.
 
squenshl said:
Then I'm a little stuck. That ##t^2## has lost me. It's easy if it's just ##t##.

##\frac{7t}{t^2} = \frac{7}{t}##. Note that the original numerator is ##7 t##, not ##2 t## as you wrote (but otherwise you did exactly the same simplification, using 2 instead of 2+5 = 7).
 
Ok why is the numerator ##\leq 7t## for ##t > 0##??
 
  • #10
squenshl said:
Ok why is the numerator ##\leq 7t## for ##t > 0##??

It isn't, and I never claimed it was. Go back and read what I wrote, word-for-word.
 
  • #11
So is it as easy as saying ##\frac{7t}{t^2} = \frac{7}{t} < \epsilon##??
 
Last edited:
  • #12
EDIT:
squenshl said:
So is it as easy as saying ##\frac{7t}{t^2} = \frac{7}{t} < \epsilon##??

Only if you understand how you got there...
Solve the two inequalities in terms of ##t##:

##2t + 5 \leq 7t##

and

##\frac{1}{t^2 + 7} \leq \frac{1}{t^2}##

What relationship do you get for t in each one? What does ##\left\{x^t\right\}_{t=1}^{\infty}## dictate for t?

If ##A \leq B## and ##B < C##, then ##A < C##, yes?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
For the first one ##t \geq 1## and second one ##t > 0##. Where am I going with this??
 
  • #14
So ##\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7} \leq \frac{7t}{t^2} = \frac{7}{t}## for ##t > 0##??
 
  • #15
squenshl said:
So ##\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7} \leq \frac{7t}{t^2} = \frac{7}{t}## for ##t > 0##??
Perfect! That's very good. (except it's for ##t \geq 1##, look at post #13 again... And our sequence specifies valid values for t (also t > n, which is a natural number...). Is our inequality ever violated?)

And if we can show ##\frac{7}{t} < \epsilon##, then we know that ##\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7} < \epsilon##, right?

If ##n \in \mathbb{N}##, is ##(7 \times n) \in \mathbb{N}##, as well?
If ##t > n## does it hold that ##7 \times t > 7 \times n##?

(Note: I will use lowecase n because I don't want to make it confusing between the variable and the set)
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Sorry, you were wrong in #13 and I didn't catch it. It's a minor error, but

##\frac{1}{t^2 + 7} \leq \frac{1}{t^2}##

##t^2 \leq t^2+7##

## 0 \leq 7##

thus, the second inequality is always true.
 
  • #17
squenshl said:
So ##\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7} \leq \frac{7t}{t^2} = \frac{7}{t}## for ##t > 0##??

One thing you're missing is that you don't need inequalities to hold for all ##t > 0##. If you are taking the limit ##t \rightarrow \infty## then you can look for inequalities that hold for large enough t. For example,

For ##t > 5## we have ##2t + 5 < 3t##
 
Last edited:
  • #18
So ##t\geq 1##.
krebs said:
Sorry, you were wrong in #13 and I didn't catch it. It's a minor error, but

##\frac{1}{t^2 + 7} \leq \frac{1}{t^2}##

##t^2 \leq t^2+7##

## 0 \leq 7##

thus, the second inequality is always true.
 
  • #19
Not sure what u mean here.
PeroK said:
One thing you're missing is that you don't need inequalities to hold for all ##t > 0##. If you are taking the limit ##t \rightarrow \infty## then you can look for inequalities that hold for large enough t. For example,

For ##t > 5## we have ##2t + 5 < 3t##
 
  • #20
I chose ##N > \frac{7}{\epsilon}## and we shall have if that ##t > N##, then $$\left|\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7}\right| < \epsilon.$$
 
  • #21
squenshl said:
Not sure what u mean here.

What you are trying to do with this problem is show what happens to your function as ##t \rightarrow \infty##. This means that when you are working with your function, you can assume that ##t## is greater than a given value. Any concerns about what happens if ##t = 0## or ##t = 1## are irrelevant to the limit. Let me given you an example.

Suppose I wanted to show that ##t^3 + 6t^2 - 15t + 173 \rightarrow \infty## as ##t \rightarrow \infty##

Well, I could try to solve cubic equations. But, instead, I would do something like this:

For ##t > 0, \ t^3 + 6t^2 - 15t + 173 > t^3 - 15t = t(t^2 - 15)##

For ##t > 4, \ t(t^2 - 15) > t##

Hence, for ##t > 4, \ t^3 + 6t^2 - 15t + 173 > t##

And, then it's very easy.
 
  • #22
Ok thanks!
PeroK said:
What you are trying to do with this problem is show what happens to your function as ##t \rightarrow \infty##. This means that when you are working with your function, you can assume that ##t## is greater than a given value. Any concerns about what happens if ##t = 0## or ##t = 1## are irrelevant to the limit. Let me given you an example.

Suppose I wanted to show that ##t^3 + 6t^2 - 15t + 173 \rightarrow \infty## as ##t \rightarrow \infty##

Well, I could try to solve cubic equations. But, instead, I would do something like this:

For ##t > 0, \ t^3 + 6t^2 - 15t + 173 > t^3 - 15t = t(t^2 - 15)##

For ##t > 4, \ t(t^2 - 15) > t##

Hence, for ##t > 4, \ t^3 + 6t^2 - 15t + 173 > t##

And, then it's very easy.
 
  • #23
I think you might be caught up on the wrong things. We are working backwards along the following proof. Normally I wouldn't post an entire proof, but you've already solved the problem. I want to make sure you have a complete understanding of how that solution worked.

  1. There exists a natural number ##a##, such that ##x > a## satisfies the inequality: ##\frac{1}{x} < \epsilon## This is known/obviously true because ##\lim_{x \to ∞} \frac{1}{x} = 0 < \epsilon##
  2. ##\frac{7}{7x} < \epsilon## 1
  3. ##\{7, a\} \in ℕ## 1 and definition of ℕ
  4. ##7a \in ℕ## 3 and closure of ℕ for multiplication
  5. let ##n = 7a##
    let ##t = 7x##
  6. ##7x > 7a## 1
    ##t > n## 1,5 and 7x > 7a
  7. ##n \in ℕ## 4,5
  8. ##\frac{7}{t} < \epsilon## 2, 5
    ##\frac{7t}{t^2} < \epsilon##
    To recap: We have shown that there exists a number "n" in ℕ, and that if t > n, then ##\frac{7}{t} < \epsilon##. The rest if the proof is algebra to show that ##\frac{5+2t}{t^2+7} < \frac{7}{t} < \epsilon##
  9. ##7 > 0## axiom
    ##t^2 + 7 > t^2##
    ##\frac{1}{t^2} > \frac{1}{t^2+7}##
    ##\frac{7t}{t^2} > \frac{7t}{t^2+7}##
  10. ##t > 1## This is a new constraint on our solution that t is greater than 1, but it doesn't matter because we can make n (and therefore t) arbitrarily large
    ##5t > 5##
    ##7t > 5+2t##
    ##\frac{7t}{t^2+7} > \frac{5+2t}{t^2+7}##
  11. ##\frac{5+2t}{t^2+7} < \frac{7t}{t^2+7} < \frac{7t}{t^2} < \epsilon## 10, 9, 8

∴ ##\frac{5+2t}{t^2+7} < \epsilon## 11, and ##t > n## 6, and ##n \in ℕ## 7
 
Last edited:
  • #24
squenshl said:
So ##t\geq 1##.

You were the one that said ##\{x_t\}_{t=1}^{\infty}## in post # 1, so that means you want ##t = 1, 2, 3, \ldots##. In other words, you only care about ##t \geq 1##. But, in fact, to analyze what happens as ##t \to \infty## you could assume ##t > 1,000,000## if you wanted to---because eventually you will be taking ##t## larger than any number you can name or write down. That's what ##t \to \infty## means.

So, ##t \geq 1##, agreed? Now, for ##t \geq 1## we have ##5 \leq 5 t##, so ##2t + 5 \leq 2t + 5t = 7t##. That's all there is to it: just basic properties of numbers.

You also have ##t^2 + 7 > t^2##, so for ##t \geq 1## you have
0 &lt; \frac{2t+5}{t^2+7} &lt; \frac{7t}{t^2} = \frac{7}{t}
 
  • #25
If you don't like the given sequence, you can work the problem on a simple equivalent in a neighborhood of ##+\infty##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K