Proving De Morgan laws inductively?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter next__
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 3K views
next__
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How can I prove <by induction> the following De Morgan laws are valid for all n >= 2

- ( P(d1) ^ ... ^ P(dn) ) = ( - P(d1) ) v ... v ( - P(dn) )

knowing that -(p^q)=(-p)v(-q) and -((p)v(q))=(-p)^(-q) ?

I can use the inductive proof method on algebra/math theorems that have to do with variables, numbers, series, sums, etc. but I don't know what to do with propositions. Help, anyone?

I know how to prove the De Morgan laws when it comes to sets, I can also do it by deduction, but I'm just curious as to how you'd go about doing this inductively.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Treat the propositions as formulas in Boolean algebra and use the fact that the operators ^ and v are (individually) associative.