MHB Proving Density of $S$ in $L^{p'}(E)$ for $g \in L^p(E)$

  • Thread starter Thread starter joypav
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
In the discussion, the problem focuses on proving that if a measurable set \( E \) has a dense subset \( S \) in \( L^{p'}(E) \) and a function \( g \in L^p(E) \) satisfies \( \int_E fg = 0 \) for all \( f \in S \), then \( g \) must equal zero. The concept of density is defined, emphasizing that for any function \( h \in L^{p'}(E) \) and any \( \epsilon > 0 \), there exists an \( f \in S \) such that \( \|f - h\|_{p'} < \epsilon \). The approach involves using Hölder's Inequality to show that the integral \( \int_E fg = 0 \) implies \( \int_E |g|^p = 0 \). Consequently, this leads to the conclusion that \( g \) must be zero in \( L^p(E) \). The proof effectively demonstrates the relationship between the density of \( S \) and the behavior of \( g \).
joypav
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
Problem:
$E$ is a measurable set and $1 \leq p < \infty$. Let $p′$ be the conjugate of $p$, and $S$ is a dense subset of $L^{p′}(E)$. Show that if $g \in L^p(E)$ and $\int_{E}fg = 0$ for all $f \in S$, then $g= 0$.

Definition of Density:
$S$ is dense in $L^{p'}(E)$ if $\forall h \in L^{p'}(E), \forall \epsilon > 0, \exists f \in S$ s.t. $\left| \left| f-h \right| \right|_{p'} < \epsilon$
or equivalently
$\exists (f_n)$ in $S$ s.t. $\lim_{{n}\to{\infty}}f_n=h$ a.e. on $E$.

Idea?:
As p and p' are conjugates, I was thinking to use Holder's Inequality.
$\int_{E}\left| fg \right| \leq \left| \left| f \right| \right|_{p'} \left| \left| g \right| \right|_p$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi joypav,

By density of $S$ in $L^{p'}(E)$, the integral $\int_E fg = 0$ for all $f \in L^{p'}(E)$. Construct $f\in L^{p'}(E)$ such that $fg = \lvert g\rvert^p$ and $\int_E \lvert f\rvert^{p'} \le \int_E \lvert g\rvert^p$. Deduce that $\int_E \lvert g\rvert^p = 0$, i.e., $\|g\|_{L^p(E)} = 0$. Then $g = 0$ in $L^p(E)$.
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K