Proving Determinant(AB)=det(A)det(B)

  • Thread starter Thread starter touch the sky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The property that determinant(AB) = det(A) * det(B) can be proven using elementary matrices and induction. An invertible matrix can be expressed as a product of elementary matrices, where the determinant of the product follows the rule det(EA) = det(E) * det(A). Additionally, transforming a square matrix into a triangular matrix does not change its determinant, and the determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal elements. This proof holds for both singular and non-singular matrices.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of determinants and their properties
  • Familiarity with elementary matrices and their determinants
  • Knowledge of triangular matrices and their determinants
  • Basic concepts of matrix multiplication
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of elementary matrices in detail
  • Learn about induction proofs in linear algebra
  • Explore the process of transforming matrices into triangular form
  • Investigate the implications of determinants in both singular and non-singular cases
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of determinants and matrix operations.

touch the sky
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

the problem is to prove that determinant(AB)=det(A)det(B)



Homework Equations


i don't think there is any equation. :(


The Attempt at a Solution

i can figure it out by taking arbitrary elements in rows and columns , but i was wondering if i can prove it in a more elegant way.
thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use a few different methods.
One way is to say that an invertible matrix is the product of elementary matrices, use some knowledge about determinants of elementary matrices (det(EA) = det(E)det(A) if E is elementary.) and do an induction proof.There is also another way where you need to know that:

You can turn a square matrix into a triangular matrix that doesn't change the determinant (up to a sign change).

The product of two triangular matrices is also triangular.

The determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of the diagonal elements.
 
touch the sky said:

Homework Statement

the problem is to prove that determinant(AB)=det(A)det(B)



Homework Equations


i don't think there is any equation. :(


The Attempt at a Solution

i can figure it out by taking arbitrary elements in rows and columns , but i was wondering if i can prove it in a more elegant way.
thanks a lot!

When I was a little girl I used to ask these types of question all the time, but discovered if you first read the paragraphs then you discover something wonderful like.

The property that det(AB) = Det(A) \cdot Det(B) can be proven using standard operations.
You remember that AB =[a_1, a_2,\ldots a_n] \cdot B if you then take the Det on both sides of the equality You will get Det(AB) = Det([a_1, a_2,\ldots a_n]) \cdot Det(B) this fact works on both singular and non-singular cases.

Enjoy :)
 
Susanne217 said:
When I was a little girl I used to ask these types of question all the time, but discovered if you first read the paragraphs then you discover something wonderful like.

The property that det(AB) = Det(A) \cdot Det(B) can be proven using standard operations.
You remember that AB =[a_1, a_2,\ldots a_n] \cdot B
This doesn't make any sense if you don't say what "a_1", "a_2", etc. are to start with! Are they rows of A or columns of A? And what do you mean by that product?

if you then take the Det on both sides of the equality You will get Det(AB) = Det([a_1, a_2,\ldots a_n]) \cdot Det(B) this fact works on both singular and non-singular cases.

Enjoy :)
 
HallsofIvy said:
This doesn't make any sense if you don't say what "a_1", "a_2", etc. are to start with! Are they rows of A or columns of A? And what do you mean by that product?

You are right :)

a_1, a_2, \cdots a_n are row in the matrix A. I also forgot to mention for this be allowed then A and B must live up to the row column rule :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
26K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K