Proving Determinant of Matrix Unchanged by Adding Columns

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The determinant of a matrix remains unchanged when adding a multiple of one column to another, as demonstrated through linear dependence. For example, given vectors u and v in R², the determinant of the matrix formed by (u, v) is zero due to linear dependence. When examining the matrix (v, w + u), the determinant can be expressed as det(v, w) + det(v, u), which simplifies to det(v, w), confirming that the determinant remains constant. This principle extends to n x n matrices, where operations involving the identity matrix and specific row replacements maintain the determinant's value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear dependence in vector spaces
  • Familiarity with determinants and their properties
  • Knowledge of matrix operations and transformations
  • Basic concepts of geometry related to area and volume
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of determinants in linear algebra
  • Learn about linear transformations and their geometric interpretations
  • Explore the implications of row operations on matrix determinants
  • Investigate the relationship between determinants and eigenvalues
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on linear algebra, matrix theory, and geometric interpretations of determinants.

Unusualskill
Messages
35
Reaction score
1
Any1 can explain in an easy way?I know is something to do with the facts that row operations do not change the determinant of a matrix and also determinant of A=determinant of A transpose.But just dk how to prove in full sentence. Appreciate any1 help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll explain by example. Let's say u is some vector in R^2 and v is a multiple of it. Then suppose we form a 2 by 2 matrix (u, v) by taking u as the first column and v as the second. The determinant is 0 because the columns are linearly dependent. We can write it as
det(u, v) = 0 = det(v, u).

Now, suppose we have a matrix (v, w). We want to see what happens when we add a multiple of v to another column, like this: (v, w+u). We can use the fact that the determinant is linear in each variable.

det(v, w + u) = det(v, w) + det(v, u) = det(v, w) + 0 = det(v,w).

The same thing will happen if we look at n by n matrices because you're adding something that's going to be linearly dependent.

Geometrically, this is like the geometry theorem that you can shear a parallelogram without changing its area. It's always base times height, so if you don't change the height, it stays the same. Try to see how that relates to my argument by drawing the parallelogram spanned by some vectors v and w, then the one spanned by v and w+u. Remember that the meaning of the determinant is that it is the signed area of this parallelogram (or volume in higher dimensions).
 
Suppose ##M## is any ##n \times n## matrix, and ##1 \leq i,j \leq n## with ##i \neq j##.

If ##I## is the ##n \times n## identity matrix and ##J## is the ##n \times n## matrix with a ##1## in row ##i##, column ##j##, and ##0## everywhere else, then define ##A = I + J##. It's easy to check that ##AM## is the matrix formed by replacing the ##i##'th row of ##M## with the sum of the ##i##'th and ##j##'th rows. Note that ##A## is either upper triangular (if ##i > j##) or lower triangular (if ##i < j##), so its determinant is the product of its diagonal elements, which are all ##1##. Therefore ##\det(A) = 1##. Consequently, ##\det(AM) = \det(A)\det(M) = \det(M)##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K